TZUTC: 1100   
   MSGID: 139.fdn_ham@3:633/509 26735042   
   REPLY: 1:18/200@fidonet 620dbf86   
   PID: Synchronet 3.19a-Linux master/8f79438d2 Apr 24 2021 GCC 8.3.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Linux master/8f79438d2 Apr 24 2021 GCC 8.3.0   
   COLS: 139   
   BBSID: ALTERANT   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.104   
     Re: Echolink and Metronet   
     By: Sean Dennis to Brian Indy on Wed Feb 16 2022 10:18 pm   
      
    > Thanks for the warning.  CGNAT is one of the huge drawbacks of IPv6 and one   
   of  the many reasons why I am not a fan of IPv6.  I am   
      
    > Why in the hell they want $120 for a single static IP on an IPv6 network   
   is  beyond me.  Considering IPv6 can supposedly support 340   
    > trillion trillion  trillion IP addresses, giving someone one static IP   
   shouldn't be much.  Sounds  like their main "front end" to the   
    > internet is IPv4 and they have very limited  IPv4 addresses available to   
   them.   
      
   I'm thinking you've got confused.   
      
   CGNAT is an IPv4 solution due to the lack of IPv4 addresses - where the answer   
   is IPv6 isnt it?   
      
   I've not heard of ISP's selling single static IPv6 addresses - I thought most   
   gave you a /64, /60 or /56 as part of the service you get with them.   
      
      
   ...ëîåï   
   --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux   
    * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (3:633/509)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 18/200 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 129/305   
   SEEN-BY: 129/330 331 153/7715 226/30 227/114 229/110 200 206 312 317   
   SEEN-BY: 229/400 424 426 428 664 700 240/5832 266/512 282/1038 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 301/1 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/267   
   SEEN-BY: 633/280 281 384 410 412 416 509 712/848 770/1   
   PATH: 633/509 280 229/426