home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   GUN_CONTROL      Liberal crybaby anti-gun bullshit      159 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 38 of 159   
   Flavio Bessa to Jeff Smith   
   Gun Control?   
   31 Oct 17 16:34:09   
   
   Hello Jeff.   
      
   26 Jul 17 23:58, you wrote to me:   
      
    >> Do you have any stories to share (or know someone) about a situation   
    >> where owning a gun saved you or your family?   
      
    JS> Yes, I have a friend who has several long guns as well as several   
    JS> handguns. He was home when at about 11:00 pm a couple guys broke into   
    JS> his house. In  the house were him, his wife, and their two kids.   
    JS> Hearing noises he got up and went to investigate carrying his 9m. He   
    JS> confronted the intruders aiming his gun at them. He said that they   
    JS> broke several things in trying to leave  the house. He also told me   
    JS> that he would have only fired if it was the only option left to   
    JS> protect himself or his family.   
      
           That's a good reason.   
      
    JS> I remember being in my car driving with my girlfriend some years ago   
    JS> in  Minneapolis, MN. A 20ish year old guy asked if he could get a   
    JS> ride. I  decided to give him a lift against the opinion of my   
    JS> girlfriend (Based on  the look she gave me).  About 5-10 minutes   
    JS> later he pulled a knife and  stuck it to my neck. He was sitting in   
    JS> the back seat behind me. He asked  for my money. I at the time was not   
    JS> carrying any weapon. I can't tell you how helpless I felt. Needless to   
    JS> say I gave him the $45 that I had on me.   
      
           But, at the time, if you had a gun with you, how could you defend   
   yourself? He had your back, with a knife stuck to your neck.   
      
    JS> Would I have felt different if he had had a gun? Not really. IMHO, if   
    JS> people have a criminal intent to rob or attack. They will acquire and   
    JS> use what ever they think they need. Be it a knife, club, or gun. They   
    JS> are not  likely to care if having, carrying, or using a gun is   
    JS> illegal. Again IMHO gun laws preventing people from owning or carrying   
    JS> a gun does little if  anything to keep the gun out of the hands of the   
    JS> criminals.   
      
           I couldn't agree with you more. I live in Brazil, and here, to own a   
   gun, you need to undergo a Kafkianesque bureaucracy that would raise a few   
   eyebrows of communist-time Russians. Nevertheless, the drug dealers and all   
   sorts of bad guys have access to the state of the art on weaponry.   
      
    JS> I realize that some from other countries might say that "We don't have   
    JS> that problem here". And that might be somewhat true. But then again we   
    JS> are not  talking about life in other countries. I am not inferring   
    JS> that we here do things better or worse than elsewhere. Guns here have   
    JS> been major part of US history. A large percentage of gun owners here   
    JS> grew up in homes that had  guns. Many homes that have guns have   
    JS> multiple guns in the home. In talking  to gun owners over the years.   
    JS> They say that the primary reason for having a gun is protection of   
    JS> their home and family with hunting and sport shooting being   
    JS> considerably less important. Many have stated that they couldn't see   
    JS> themselves without owning or carrying a gun.   
      
           But I tell you... We do have this problem here. I can remember of two   
   recent school shootings: One was on 2013, when a crazy guy bought a .38   
   Special handgun from a friend for 20 USD and went to his old high school. He   
   killed around 10 people before a police officer shot him.   
           The other was about one month ago. The 16-year old was the son of a   
   police officer and managed to grab the mother's pistol without her knowledge   
   and took it to the school vowing for revenge from bullies. 8 dead.   
           On the other hand, we have HUGE violence numbers here, despite all the   
   gun control laws we have. Chances of a person to die by weapons fire in Brazil   
   are higher than in Syria or Iraq.   
           My father is a shooting sportsman and I've grown with weapons all   
   around, I learned the responsability that carrying a gun brings with you.   
           And also I can tell you that, in the city of Rio alone, from January   
   until today, 121 police officers were killed here. Of these, around 20% were   
   in the line of duty, but the other 80% died while they weren't working, trying   
   to defend themselves while being robbed or so.   
           Here the biggest problem is not house break-ins, but armed robbery,   
   carjacking, kidnapping... Into all of these felonies the bad guy has the   
   surprise factor on its favor.   
      
    >> I am asking this because I live in Brazil, and here the laws   
    >> concerning the possession of firearms are extremely restrictive, to   
    >> the extent that is almost impossible to the average person to own a   
    >> gun, and it's 100% impossible to carry a gun outside the home   
    >> without being a police officer.   
      
    JS> Do the gun ownership restrictions there keep someone from getting a   
    JS> gun if  they decide to use one?   
      
           There's the right for self-defense, but it will be a long court   
   battle.    
           Recently a very famous model/actress was surprised by a fan in a hotel   
   room with a gun. The guy was crazy and wanted to kill her like that guy that   
   killed John Lennon. Her brother was at the room and struggle with the   
   attacker, managed to take his handgun and shot him three times.   
      
           Now he is facing murder charges. Of course he is appealing for   
   self-defense, but years will take until this is settled.   
      
           Even if I have a gun at home to protect my family, if someone breaks   
   into my house and I eventually shoot and kill the guy, I'll be in deep   
   trouble.    
      
    >> Nevertheless, the crime rate has reached an all-time high here. It's   
    >> so high that if you leave your home for a walk in the block the   
    >> chances of someon robbing you at gunpoint are like 3 into 10.   
      
    JS> I guess you have just answered my last question. My attitude is that   
    JS> if gun laws prevent private ownership and/or possession of guns. Then   
    JS> the only people that will carry guns are the criminals. With the   
    JS> exception of the police of course. Am I in favor of stricter gun laws?   
    JS> Yes I am. I think that people should have the right to own and carry a   
    JS> gun. Provided that they are mentally capable of being properly   
    JS> responsible for it's safe operation and use. Also known criminals   
    JS> should be prevented from ownership or possession. But that is really   
    JS> an unenforceable restriction. I also think that gun ownership and   
    JS> possession should require proper and verified gun safety training. I   
    JS> help provide gun safety training at several local locations. Training   
    JS> that the  state currently requires. The majority of the students are   
    JS> children ranging in ages from 9 to 20 years old. It is important that   
    JS> a society that has,  and owns gun knows how to safely use, store, and   
    JS> operate a firearm. And to properly respect it.   
      
           You are absolutely right. My problem is that my society haven't   
   evolved to such a level, and I believe that, if the gun laws here would be   
   softer, we would be back into the Old West times. But that's a Brazilian issue.   
      
    >> That being said, what would be the value of having a gun in such an   
    >> environment? The attacker has always the element of surprise, and if   
    >> they find > out that you have a gun, you won't come back home alive   
    >> to tell a  story...   
      
    JS> Hypothetically, if you were intent on burglarizing a home. And if you   
    JS> were  reasonably certain that that household had a gun inside. Would   
    JS> you be less inclined to approach that home?   
      
           Logic dictates that the offender would choose a house that did not   
   have a gun inside, but here the bad guys are so well-armed that they simply   
   won't care. Can a 9mm be a match for 5-6 guys with AK-47s, military training   
   and surprise factor?   
      
   Flavio   
      
   ... "Self-estima" - Reptile Shaman   
   --- MacFidoIP 1.0 (OSX)   
    * Origin: Hyperion's Orbit - Resisting since 1995! (4:801/189.1)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca