Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    GUNS_N_SUCH    |    I'm guessing its about guns and such?    |    78 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 73 of 78    |
|    Mike Powell to All    |
|    Smashing up a 3D printed    |
|    25 Aug 25 09:02:50    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 47.gunssuch@1:2320/105 2d11a339       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       FORMAT: flowed       Smashing up a 3D printed ghost gun won't be enough to prevent CSIs from       retrieving data for forensic analysis - here's why              Date:       Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:03:00 +0000              Description:       Fingerprinting in 3D printing could curb ghost guns, yet raises debates over       privacy, regulation, and enforcement on personal printing machines.              FULL STORY              The rise of 3D printing has offered new ways to produce tools, spare parts,       and even art. Yet its darker use has gained attention through ghost guns.               These are firearms produced outside regulatory systems, which are difficult        to trace and have already been implicated in violent crime, including the        2024 killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.               Thankfully, researchers now believe that even if someone smashes such an       object, investigators could still recover valuable forensic information.              Building a system of hidden fingerprints               The idea of fingerprinting in 3D printing is not entirely new. Various       approaches embed unique information into printed items, often including       details like timestamps, printer identification, and geolocation data.               Until now, a weakness has remained: what happens when a printed object is       broken into pieces or deliberately tampered with?               A team led by Netanel Raviv at Washington University in St. Louis has       developed a system designed to withstand such attempts.               Its framework, named Secure Information Embedding and Extraction (SIDE), uses       mathematical methods that allow fragments to retain enough encoded detail for       investigators to recover key information.               The SIDE system is built on earlier work presented at the IEEE International       Symposium on Information Theory in 2024, which focused on encoding methods       resilient enough to reconstruct data from partial remains.               By extending those ideas, the current study adds security mechanisms that can       require 3D printers to include such fingerprints automatically.               According to the researchers, SIDE does not just add markings but uses       loss-tolerant embedding techniques. This means that even a weapon        deliberately broken into pieces may still yield identifiable data during       forensic analysis.               On one hand, fingerprinting techniques could make it harder for illicit       weapons to circulate undetected.               On the other hand, this raises questions about the scope of surveillance,       control over personal manufacturing, and the balance between security and       privacy.               A beginner 3D printer used for harmless home projects might soon be subject        to the same requirements as industrial machines if regulators decide to       mandate such systems.               While the debate will likely focus on ghost guns, SIDE has potential uses far       beyond weapon tracing.               Any item produced with a 3D printer could, in theory, carry this invisible       signature.               Combined with AI tools for pattern recognition and data recovery,       investigators could reconstruct timelines and identities from fragments of       plastic or resin.               "This work opens up new ways to protect the public from the harmful aspects        of 3D printing through a combination of mathematical contributions and new       security mechanisms," said Netanel Raviv, assistant professor of computer       science & engineering in the McKelvey School of Engineering at Washington       University in St. Louis.               "While SIDE has limitations in defending against resourceful attackers with       strong expertise in 3D printing, it raises the level of sophistication, prior       knowledge, and expertise required from the adversary to remain undetected       after committing the crime."               Via Techxplore              ======================================================================       Link to news story:       https://www.techradar.com/pro/smashing-up-a-3d-printed-ghost-gun-wont-be-enoug       h-to-prevent-csis-from-retrieving-data-for-forensic-analysis-heres-why              $$       --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux        * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/305 153/7715 154/110 218/700 226/30       SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 206 307 317 426 428 470 700 705 266/512 291/111       SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 396/45 460/58 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12       SEEN-BY: 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca