Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    GOLDED    |    GoldED Public Release discussion.    |    2,690 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 301 of 2,690    |
|    Robert Bashe to Roy Witt    |
|    GoldED+ snapshot 2012.02.29    |
|    09 Apr 12 08:42:22    |
      Roy Witt wrote to Robert Bashe on Sunday April 08 2012 at 07:29:              RW>>> I use FE as GoldEd's messagebase.              RB>> FE is a tosser and has no messagebase. It just works with quite a       RB>> number of them.              RW> Oh? What does the MSGBASE sub-folder under FE have in it?              That tells me you're using a Hudson messagebase (or simply have the Hudson       structure, as described below).              Although I have no MSGBASE subfolder, only "HUDSON" and "SQUISH". I use the       squish subfolder to assemble the echo list for FE after tossing. The Hudson       structure exists, but is not used as a messagebase.              RW> Why, it's a message base! How odd.              Hudson. There is no "native" FE messagebase. It merely uses/supports them. In       the doc there's the statement: "* Very fast and fully featured TOSSER/SCANNER       for Hudson- (aka QBBS), JAM-, Squish-, and Fido/*.MSG-Messagebase."              One peculiarity is this:              "You MUST here define the complete path and directory where you want the       Hudson Message Base structure to reside. If the HMB (or QBBS) messagebase       structure doesn't already exist, it will be automatically created directly       by FESetup. Well, you can choose to work with messagebases such as JAM       or SQUISH or *.MSG only or the same combined of course but, in any cases you       MUST have at least the HMB structure in your choosen directory even if unused.       (Don't worry, the HMB structures takes only an handful of bytes)"              I've never throught to ask why the Hudson structure must be present even if       you don't use that messagebase.              RB>> Thanks for the flowers.              RW> You don't get flowers for making an easy job harder to do, as in       RW> having to edit a text based config file.              Depends on the program. I generally have no problems with text configurations,       and in some cases it's easier to find something with them (here I'm thinking       of the GoldED configuration, which would be a mess if someone tried to squeeze       it into a GUI. As it is, I just have to search the text for what I want to       see/change.              RB>> I'll pass that on to the author, who lives some 5 miles away from me       RB>> and now has his own IT company ;-)              RW> Tell him that he'd have better luck if he provided a GUI system..              Tell him yourself: Tobias Burchchardt, 2:2448/401. That's his binkd address,       and he speaks good English. But if you want to suggest improvements, save       yourself the trouble. He doesn't do much developing for fido nowadays, and you       can get a free FE key if you ask him politely.              RW>>> Plus it has another option to export a 'squish' text file if one       RW>>> wants such a thing.              RB>> Never seen the option, and I suspect it would be for individual       RB>> echos, not for everything at once.              RW> Example.              Ah, OK - I thought you meant the squishbase. Got confused there.              RW>>> One could probably export it to a squish messagebase and have it       RW>>> running in minutes instead of hours.              Possibly. But if you're running Hudson, you'd probably have to have some kind       of conversion program. Maybe not... I've never worked with such things and       have little experience in converting the various messagebases.              RB>>>> No experience with anything else.              RW>>> Too bad.              Never had any problems, and like they say "Don't rouch a running system". I       occasionally have to clean up the squishbase, for which there's a special       program. Otherwise all I can say is that I've been using squishbase since 1993       without difficulties.              RB>> You never know until you try - and anyway, you know that what you're       RB>> using yourself is "the best" ;-)              RW> I think so. And so does a major NAB hub who has just recently switched       RW> to FE.              As a matter of curiosity, what was he using before?              Cheers, Bob              --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-0613        * Origin: Jabberwocky System - 02363-56073 ISDN/V34 (2:2448/44)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca