REPLY: 1:104/117 65ecbd40   
   MSGID: 2:423/39 65edb110   
   CHRS: LATIN-2 2   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.62   
   Hello Vitaliy!   
      
   09 Mar 24 12:44, you wrote to me:   
      
    VA> Could you please make sure that your system actually has such locale?   
      
    VA> What does it show if you run:   
    VA> LANG=cs_CZ.ISO8859-2 locale   
      
   .. LANG=cs_CZ.ISO8859-2 locale   
   LANG=cs_CZ.ISO8859-2   
   LC_CTYPE="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_NUMERIC="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_TIME="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_COLLATE="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_MONETARY="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_MESSAGES="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_PAPER="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_NAME="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_ADDRESS="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_TELEPHONE="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_MEASUREMENT="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_IDENTIFICATION="cs_CZ.ISO8859-2"   
   LC_ALL=   
      
    VA> Also try to run:   
    VA> locale -a   
      
   .. locale -a | grep cs_CZ   
   cs_CZ   
   cs_CZ.iso88592   
   cs_CZ.utf8   
      
      
    VA> It could be both. Could you please show your xlat setup?   
      
   GOLDED is showed as Group B   
   in cfg (this is the latest, changed also based on the latest advice)   
      
   GROUP B   
   XLATPATH /home/fido/golded/xlat   
   XLATCHARSET CP437 LATIN-2                       asc_il2.chs   
   XLATCHARSET LATIN-2 CP437                       il2_asc.chs   
   XLATCHARSET CP437 UTF-8                         437_u8.chs   
   XLATIMPORT CP437   
   XLATIMPORT CP437   
   XLATLOCALSET LATIN-2   
   MSGLISTWIDESUBJ   YES   
   ENDGROUP   
      
    VA> BTW, luit works for me. Only difference is that my FidoNet charset is   
    VA> KOI8-r.   
      
   It is working for me in local, czech echomail.   
      
    VA> As for UTF - it's not supported and might "work" if you do some weird   
    VA> setup, but I'd not count on it. Better work in one-byte locales like   
    VA> cp437 or ISO8859-2 in your case.   
      
   Where I am reading, usualy they use English. Then pure ASCII should be enough.   
   And I would be OK even for some exceptional scrambled messages. But why some   
   Subject lines are impacted? I see whole message OK, just that line has copied   
   over 4 bytes. Always the same position.   
      
    VA> I totally understand you. I spend several days before my system   
    VA> started to work OK. Will try to resolve your issues. :)   
      
   No problem. Have that since years. I just started to wonder if somebody else   
   can see that. Take is as the lowest prio.   
      
   I checked code already, for some "quick win" - but I am not c-guy = nothing   
   found by myself.   
      
   Thank you for any help.   
      
   Karel   
      
   --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20240209   
    * Origin: Plast DATA (2:423/39)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/0 18/200 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260   
   SEEN-BY: 129/305 135/225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/1   
   SEEN-BY: 221/6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 307 317 400   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5555 282/1038 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 420/33 333 421/79 83 423/39   
   SEEN-BY: 423/81 120 121 460/16 58 256 1124 5858 467/888 633/280 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 770/1 5020/400 1042 5054/30   
   PATH: 423/39 81 221/1 280/464 460/58 229/426