Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    GOLDED    |    GoldED Public Release discussion.    |    2,690 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,004 of 2,690    |
|    andrew clarke to Vitaliy Aksyonov    |
|    Compilers/systems    |
|    07 Feb 23 15:41:35    |
      REPLY: 1:104/117 63e1cfc5       MSGID: 3:633/267 63e1dd46       CHRS: LATIN-1 2       TZUTC: 1100       TID: hpt/fbsd 1.9.0-cur 2021-04-15       On 2023-02-06 21:10:08, Vitaliy Aksyonov (1:104/117) wrote to All:               VA> I want to do some code refactoring to remove dangerous coding        VA> approaches. Like memset() instead of new(), printf(), etc.               VA> Which compilers are still in use to build GoldED+ and for which systems?              If you're taking over development then it's really up to you what you want to       support.              Linux, FreeBSD or MacOS users will have modern versions of GCC and Clang       available.              Ideally the Windows version should be built with a version of MSVC that has       full STL support. This would exclude now-ancient MSVC versions like Visual       Studio 6.0 from 1998.              From memory the very recent versions of MSVC no longer produce binaries that       will run under Windows XP. I've found a good "middle ground" is something like       Visual Studio 2012, which still runs well under Windows 10 & 11.              OTOH it would be preferable if a free compiler could be used in Windows.       Recently I learned that in 2020 Embarcadero released a fork of Dev-C++ that       provides GCC 9.2 and supports C++11:              https://github.com/Embarcadero/Dev-Cpp/releases              OS/2 I'm not really sure about, but I know there are modern versions of GCC       available from the Netlabs repos.              I was going to suggest DOS/DPMI support should be dropped, but I see GCC       10.2.0 was ported to DJGPP in 2020, so that's probably useable. Though I doubt       many people would complain if DOS support was removed from future GoldED       versions.              Another option for Windows, OS/2 & DOS may be to build with a recent version       of OpenWatcom 2.0, though I don't know how well it supports STL or C++11. It       may be good enough.       The great thing about OpenWatcom 2.0 is can run under Linux, and it's also a       cross-compiler, so you can build DOS, Windows & OS/2 apps from Linux.              --- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20220504        * Origin: Blizzard of Ozz, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (3:633/267)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 18/200 90/1 104/117 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131       SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/7715 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113       SEEN-BY: 229/114 206 307 317 400 424 426 428 452 470 664 700 266/512       SEEN-BY: 280/464 282/1038 292/854 301/1 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200       SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 633/267 280 712/620 848 770/1 5080/102       PATH: 633/267 712/848 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca