Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    GOLDED    |    GoldED Public Release discussion.    |    2,690 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,558 of 2,690    |
|    Kai Richter to Paul Quinn    |
|    bold italic underline - how?    |
|    04 Nov 20 17:28:20    |
      REPLY: 3:640/1384 5fa28cad       MSGID: 2:240/77 5fa2d6c4       CHRS: LATIN-1 2       TID: hpt/lnx 1.4.0-sta 09-04-05       Hello Paul!              04 Nov 20, Paul Quinn wrote to Kai Richter:               PQ>>> Further steps will probably require a further integration of        PQ>>> Fidonet into the collection of internets.               KR>> ?? What steps? That is already done! All you need to do is to        KR>> upgrade your software and find an access point. You will have        KR>> full markup support, real bold italic and underline is no        KR>> problem, you could integrate pictures, audio and video into your        KR>> postings. Thousands of Boards are waiting for you.               PQ> Yes, that is what I intimated. Have you seen the 'telegrams'?              No. I don't understand telegrams in this context. Intimating fails due to       translation. Sorry.               PQ> My favourite interface is NNTP.               PQ> See what I mean(t)?              No. Just update your software to get all new features. Due to age-, support-       and licence-reasons it will be impossible to integrate new stuff into mostly       all fidonet software. There is a high risk that any new feature will break       older existing systems (For example, some multibyte chars will trash my       terminal output completely). If you want features like real bold, italic or       underlined text, or the possibility to display any language symbol in its       original form, want to use pictures, audio or video, or links to other       postings, then upgrade to the new protocols.              If you could do internet and fidonet integration, where will be the difference       then? It will be a part of the bigger thing and it will lose it's identity.              If you got a working integration then you could use both protocols within one       software. But if your software could do HTML5 tagged text why should you       change back to ascii if any other software can read HTML5 due to full       integration? There is none, the users will be too lazy to switch back to the       old standard, never change a running setting. The result would be that the old       standard became obsolete completely. That's why an integration of fidonet into       internets will be a wasted efford.              And uhh, sorry for offtopic.              Regards              Kai              --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.4.7        * Origin: Monobox (2:240/77)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 120/340 123/131 226/30 227/114 229/101       SEEN-BY: 229/275 424 426 452 664 1016 240/77 2100 5138 5411 5832 5853       SEEN-BY: 240/6309 249/206 317 400 280/464 292/854 310/31 317/3 320/219       SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 633/280 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119       PATH: 240/77 5832 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca