REPLY: 3581.golded@1:103/705 2405f1ea   
   MSGID: 2:240/77 5fa1341e   
   CHRS: LATIN-1 2   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.4.0-sta 09-04-05   
   Hello Rob!   
      
   02 Nov 20, Rob Swindell wrote to Paul Quinn:   
      
    RS> Okay, no problem. I think it's a cool feature and it'd nice if more   
    RS> BBS packages and offline readers supported a compatible markup.   
      
   What for? I don't _see_ the difference between an underlined and low dash   
   tagged word within ascii universe networks like Fidonet. Basically there is   
   not much need for markups. Look around in typical common media, bold italic   
   and underline markups are used very rarely because there is no significant   
   change of the content - a no is still a no and a _no_ is more no than no - or   
   a dead is more than _dead_ and a _faster_ is still more than fast and much   
   more faster than faster?   
      
   The one useful markup for quotes is italic and that function is already   
   covered by the > sign at the beginning of a quoted line.   
      
   Regards   
      
   Kai   
      
   --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.4.7   
    * Origin:  Monobox  (2:240/77)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 120/340 123/131 226/30 227/114 229/101   
   SEEN-BY: 229/275 424 426 452 664 1016 240/77 2100 5138 5411 5832 5853   
   SEEN-BY: 240/6309 249/206 317 400 280/464 292/854 310/31 317/3 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 633/280 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119   
   PATH: 240/77 5832 229/426