Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    FNEWS_PUBLISH    |    I think its just the Fidonews ezine only    |    1,536 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,485 of 1,536    |
|    FidoNews Robot to All    |
|    FidoNews 43:01 [01/07]: General Articles    |
|    05 Jan 26 00:06:08    |
      MSGID: 2:2/2.0 10488a20       REPLY: 2:2/2.0 10488a1f       CHRS: CP850 2       =================================================================        GENERAL ARTICLES       =================================================================               IPv6 in 2025        By Michiel van der Vlist, 2:280/5555                     Another year has passed. When we compare the statistics as published       by the end of 2023 and 2024 with those of today, we see that there is       little or no growth. The number of Fidonet IPv6 nodes keeps hoovering       around 110. On 31 December there were 116 IPv6 nodes. Considering that       Fidonet a s a whole has stopped growing a long time ago and is now       shrinking that isn't really bad.               120 _|        _| .        110 _| . .        _| .        100 _| .        _| .        90 _|        _| .        80 _| .        _|        70 _| .        _|        60 _|        _| .        50 _|        _|        40 _| .        _|        30 _|        _| .        20 _|        _|        10 _| .        _|        0 _|______________________________________________________________        | | | | | | | | | | | | |        2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026              Outside of Fidonet IPv6 continues to grow. Slowly but steadily. Accor-       ding to Google worldwide IPv6 adoptation now hoovers around or just       under 50%. Almost half of those visiting Google do so via IPv6.              https://www.google.com/intl/nl/ipv6/statistics.html              Some even claim the tipping point has been reached where IPv6 is now       the norm but I would say this is premature.              Back to Fidonet.              The number of Fidonet IPv6 nodes that still uses a tunnel dropped from       a quarter to a fifth. Nearly all of them via he.net, but a few via       another tunnel broker. So there is improvement but there are still too       many ISPs around that do not support IPv6. Shame!              The number of nodes carrying the INO4 flag dropped from 3 to 2. So the       vast majority of Fidonet still supports full IPv4. Not really what I       expected, but that is what it is. What I expected was that providers       switching their customers to CGNAT would have resulted in much more       IPv6 only nodes. But that obviously did no happen. Yet. That does not       mean CGNAT did not happen and that it is not a problem. With the       coming of FTTH (Fibre To The Home) especially here in Europe we see       many new ISPs that do not have lots of "historic" IPv4 and who do not       have, or do not want to spend, large sums of money to buy IPv4 on the       market. So they use CGNAT to have their customers connect to the IPv4       internet. Some of these providers - like mine - give customers the       option to get an IPv4 address outside the CGNAT pool and some don't.       But Fidonet sysops are resourcefull and they look for work arounds. In       Germany there is feste-ip.net that jumped in the gap. They provide       IPv4 access to servers run at home via an IPv4 to IPv6 port forwarder.       I mentioned that in my article titled "DS-Lite: a solution" in FN       34:33 Aug 2017. Some Fidonet sysop are using this or a similar service       to deal with CGNAT.              Another remarkable development is that a number of Fidonet systems       advertise IPv6 capability via an AAAA record on the host name in the       nodelist, but they dot not actually support IPv6. Dmitry Protasoff       maintains a system that (among other things) monitors the nodelist       for systems that advertise IPv6 capability.              https://nodelist.fidonet.cc/analytics/ipv6              Compare that to the list of nodes That advertise IPv6 but are actually       IPv4 only:              https://nodelist.fidonet.cc/analytics/ipv6-advertised-ipv4-only              So some 20% of the nodes advertising IPv6 connectivity do not actually       support it. One of the problems with dual stack is that if one of the       advertised connection mechanims fails, it can take a long time before       it is discovered. Most applications just fall back to IPv4 if IPv6       fails. That includes nearly all binkp capable mailers. Winpoint is the       odd exception.              This large number of nodes that advertise IPv6 connectivity but that       do not actually support it is a bit of a mystery to me. My impression       is that many of those sysops are not even aware of the situation.       They make use of he services of a DNS provider that supports DDNS       and they get an IPv6 address assigned by default. Of which they do       not seem to be aware and so they do not configure their systems to       accept incoming IPv6 calls. This is a bit of speculation as most of       the sysops concerend do not respond to netmail, the systems seem to       run on autopilot.              Another phenomenon that may have existed for some time but that only       recently emerged from Dmitry's statistics is that there are a number       of nodes who's IPv6 reachability is unstable. One day they have IPv6       and the next day they haven't. To be back again after a couple of       days.              https://nodelist.fidonet.cc/analytics/ipv6-weekly-news              I have no explanation but the fact many of these nodes reside in       regions 46 and 50 suggests it may have to do with the war going on in       Eastern Europe. The observed instability may or may not be       specificallly linked to IPv6, it may affect their IPv4 reachability as       well, but that was not investigated.                     In order not to have to tell the same story over and over again, I       sometimes refer people to Fidonews articles I wrote in the past.       Since there seems to be no easely available searcheable archive, I       made a list of these articles. I hope I did not miss any.              My previous Fidonews articles about IPv6:                     FN 26:31 Jul 2009 FidoNet and IPv6       FN 28:04 Jan 2011 FidoNet and IPv4 depletion       FN 28:07 Feb 2011 Fido and IPv6 Day       FN 28:16 Apr 2011 APNIC runs out       FN 28:20 May 2011 The IPv6 echo       FN 28:31 Aug 2011 A SECOND LIFE FOR THE LINKSYS Part 1       FN 28:32 Aug 2011 A SECOND LIFE FOR THE LINKSYS PArt 2       FN 28:45 Nov 2011 A "first"       FN 29:04 Jan 2012 World IPv6 Launch Day, 6 June 2012       FN 29:09 Feb 2012 A SECOND LIFE FOR THE LINKSYS Part 3       FN 29:38 Sep 2012 RIPE is out of IPv4 addresses.       FN 32:17 Apr 2015 IPv6 penetration in the nodelist       FN 32:26 Jun 2015 ARIN is out of IPv4 addresses.       FN 32:52 Dec 2015 IPv6 in Fidonet by the end of 2015       FN 33:02 Jan 2016 IPv6 in two thousand SIX teen       FN 33:06 Feb 2016 Another barrier broken.       FN 34:01 Jan 2017 IPv6 in 2016       FN 34:13 Mar 2017 SixXs Sunset 06-06-2017       FN 34:30 Jul 2017 TV without IPv6       FN 34:31 Jul 2017 DS-Lite emulation experiment v2.0       FN 34:37 Sep 2017 DS-Lite emulation experiment 2.0, the results       FN 34:33 Aug 2017 DS-Lite: a solution       FN 34:38 Sep 2017 DS-Lite Emulation experiment v2.1       FN 35:01 Jan 2018 IPv6 in 2017       FN 35:53 Dec 2018 IPv6 in 2018       FN 36:52 Dec 2019 IPv6 in 2019       FN 38:01 Jan 2021 IPv6 in 2020       FN 38:20 May 2021 100 IPv6 nodes       FN 39:01 Jan 2022 IPv6 in 2021       FN 40:01 Jan 2023 IPv6 in 2022       FN 41:01 Jan 2024 IPv6 in 2023       FN 41:53 Dec 2024 IPv6 in 2024       FN 42:01 Jan 2025 IPv6 only experiment              Happy IPv6 in 2026.              No AI was used for writing this article.       -----------------------------------------------------------------              --- Azure/NewsPrep 3.0        * Origin: Home of the Fidonews (2:2/2.0)       SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 2/2 16/0 19/37 105/81 123/130 128/187 129/14 142/104       SEEN-BY: 154/110 203/0 2 124 412 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110 112       SEEN-BY: 229/134 206 275 426 428 470 700 705 230/0 240/5832 280/464       SEEN-BY: 280/5003 291/111 320/119 219 319 2119 322/762 423/81 902/26       PATH: 2/2 203/0 320/219 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca