Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    FMAIL_HELP    |    Fmail support    |    2,396 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 985 of 2,396    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to Paul Quinn    |
|    Re: Trialing FMail/lnx status check-in    |
|    07 Sep 17 13:51:16    |
      Hi Paul,              On 2017-09-07 21:47:00, you wrote to me:               WvV>> Maybe the loging/printing isn't perfect, but this all        WvV>> seems fine. Have you checked if the mail arrived at it's        WvV>> destination (3:640/384) ?               PQ> Maybe so. They were only test posts within a 'sandbox'. OTOH, I've just        PQ> now checked the mail bundle with David Nugent's 'InspectA' util, and found        PQ> the posts were written properly.              Ok, nice!               PQ> Even the TZUTC values were correct.              That's put there by golded! ;)              Only ftools generates TZUTC kludges when you use the 'post' function.               WvV>> If you are not certain you can have FMail make backups of        WvV>> outgoing .pkt files by specifying a "Outgoing backup"        WvV>> directory in FConfig. So you have a way of checking what's        WvV>> produced without it disappearing because of your mailer        WvV>> (or other processes) doing their jobs...               PQ> I used to when I first started toying with FMail/lnx, but soon turned that        PQ> off. They're effectively being backup up for the duration of the testing        PQ> phase by not being sent anywhere. They're boxed in as if "lab rats". :)              That also works. ;)              Bye, Wilfred.              --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815        * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca