Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    FMAIL_HELP    |    Fmail support    |    2,396 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 969 of 2,396    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to Paul Quinn    |
|    Re: Trialing FMail/lnx status check-in    |
|    04 Sep 17 13:23:06    |
      Hi Paul,              On 04 Sep 17 18:46, Paul Quinn wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:        about: "Trialing FMail/lnx status check-in":               PQ> FMail/lnx is wonderful, Wilfred. Thank you for letting me try it out.              Thank you for testing it! ;)               PQ> What was what I call 'Phase 1' testing ceased for me at about midday on        PQ> Saturday. Test packets originated from -this- node as received from my        PQ> current peer linked Fidonet systems. They were shoved otherwise-untouched        PQ> to my test system via binkD, and ingested by FMail.               PQ> With FMail, I have enjoyed seeing _full_ inter-zone SEENBY & PATH data in        PQ> messages. These items form the singular function that's caused me to try        PQ> FMail.               PQ> FMail was under rigorous supervision for about three weeks of 24/7        PQ> operation. I think there's about three Mb of logfiles with nary a glitch        PQ> reported, IIRC.              (I had to look up "nary" ;))               PQ> It did turn up that weirdness with message sorting that I was later to        PQ> find was subject to what Uncle Google & Wikipedia tells me is the        PQ> 'Observer effect'. After I reworked the data originating from FastEcho,        PQ> whose packet size limits dated from the POTS days, all was well.               PQ> Interestingly, a couple of AreaMgr requests were replied to but the        PQ> responses were not sent. I guess that could be the case with potential        PQ> PING responses as well. Is that normal? (On my main node [~/384] I would        PQ> have a BATch file check for any *.Msg files in the netmail path, since the        PQ> primary netmail area is usually empty, and would attempt a PACK if any        PQ> such mails existed.) How do you recommend they be completed by FMail if        PQ> it is the only configured netmail area?              Do these mails have the 'Crash' flag set? Crash mail needs to be packed with       "special" command line options:               .../fmail pack '*' '-c'              Where '*' can be replaced by any fidonet address, or match pattern, if you       want to just pack netmail for specific destinations. E.g. '3:640/*'.              And make sure to put the pattern between single quotes, otherwise your shell       might expand it to filenames!               PQ> The 'Phase 2' test occurred later on Saturday and lasted for about 10        PQ> seconds or less. :) It's premise was simply continuing function with a        PQ> pre-existing messagebase, from that morning's backup from this node. I        PQ> did allow the *.Msg, HMB areas & dupe ID database to remain as they were.        PQ> FMail cruised through the test without even a grunt.               PQ> On Sunday I was surprised and pleased by the 'badmail' capability to        PQ> detect old mails... it found one! (It was a phurphy from region 18 IIRC,        PQ> and was a re-badged old mail from NZ.) Did yours? ;-)              There was some regurgitated echomail originating from 1:15/0, partly in wrong       areas. But none in my bad area, because none were older then my 60 day setting       for old mail... And none in a NZ_* area...?               PQ> Now 'Phase 3'. I'm thinking of doing some sort of export SCANning of        PQ> outbound mails. I think I need something further from you? Do you have        PQ> something of a 32-bit flavour, please? :)              The fmail and ftools I gave you are 32-bit, so I don't understand?              Wilfred.              --- FMail-W32 2.0.1.4        * Origin: point@work (2:280/464.112)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca