home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   FMAIL_HELP      Fmail support      2,396 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 969 of 2,396   
   Wilfred van Velzen to Paul Quinn   
   Re: Trialing FMail/lnx status check-in   
   04 Sep 17 13:23:06   
   
   Hi Paul,   
      
   On 04 Sep 17 18:46, Paul Quinn wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:   
     about: "Trialing FMail/lnx status check-in":   
      
    PQ> FMail/lnx is wonderful, Wilfred.  Thank you for letting me try it out.   
      
   Thank you for testing it! ;)   
      
    PQ> What was what I call 'Phase 1' testing ceased for me at about midday on   
    PQ> Saturday.  Test packets originated from -this- node as received from my   
    PQ> current peer linked Fidonet systems.  They were shoved otherwise-untouched   
    PQ> to my test system via binkD, and ingested by FMail.   
      
    PQ> With FMail, I have enjoyed seeing _full_ inter-zone SEENBY & PATH data in   
    PQ> messages.  These items form the singular function that's caused me to try   
    PQ> FMail.   
      
    PQ> FMail was under rigorous supervision for about three weeks of 24/7   
    PQ> operation.  I think there's about three Mb of logfiles with nary a glitch   
    PQ> reported, IIRC.   
      
   (I had to look up "nary" ;))   
      
    PQ> It did turn up that weirdness with message sorting that I was later to   
    PQ> find was subject to what Uncle Google & Wikipedia tells me is the   
    PQ> 'Observer effect'.  After I reworked the data originating from FastEcho,   
    PQ> whose packet size limits dated from the POTS days, all was well.   
      
    PQ> Interestingly, a couple of AreaMgr requests were replied to but the   
    PQ> responses were not sent.  I guess that could be the case with potential   
    PQ> PING responses as well.  Is that normal?  (On my main node [~/384] I would   
    PQ> have a BATch file check for any *.Msg files in the netmail path, since the   
    PQ> primary netmail area is usually empty, and would attempt a PACK if any   
    PQ> such mails existed.)  How do you recommend they be completed by FMail if   
    PQ> it is the only configured netmail area?   
      
   Do these mails have the 'Crash' flag set? Crash mail needs to be packed with   
   "special" command line options:   
      
     .../fmail pack '*' '-c'   
      
   Where '*' can be replaced by any fidonet address, or match pattern, if you   
   want to just pack netmail for specific destinations. E.g. '3:640/*'.   
      
   And make sure to put the pattern between single quotes, otherwise your shell   
   might expand it to filenames!   
      
    PQ> The 'Phase 2' test occurred later on Saturday and lasted for about 10   
    PQ> seconds or less.  :)  It's premise was simply continuing function with a   
    PQ> pre-existing messagebase, from that morning's backup from this node.  I   
    PQ> did allow the *.Msg, HMB areas & dupe ID database to remain as they were.   
    PQ> FMail cruised through the test without even a grunt.   
      
    PQ> On Sunday I was surprised and pleased by the 'badmail' capability to   
    PQ> detect old mails... it found one!  (It was a phurphy from region 18 IIRC,   
    PQ> and was a re-badged old mail from NZ.)  Did yours?  ;-)   
      
   There was some regurgitated echomail originating from 1:15/0, partly in wrong   
   areas. But none in my bad area, because none were older then my 60 day setting   
   for old mail... And none in a NZ_* area...?   
      
    PQ> Now 'Phase 3'.  I'm thinking of doing some sort of export SCANning of   
    PQ> outbound mails.  I think I need something further from you?  Do you have   
    PQ> something of a 32-bit flavour, please?  :)   
      
   The fmail and ftools I gave you are 32-bit, so I don't understand?   
      
   Wilfred.   
      
   --- FMail-W32 2.0.1.4   
    * Origin:  point@work  (2:280/464.112)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca