Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    FMAIL_HELP    |    Fmail support    |    2,396 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 755 of 2,396    |
|    Nicholas Boel to Wilfred van Velzen    |
|    Status check    |
|    26 Jul 17 16:41:12    |
      Hello,              On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:43:36 +0200, Wilfred Van Velzen -> Nicholas Boel wrote:               WvV> It's already compiling with a current gnu compiler, without errors and        WvV> warnings. So I don't expect many of those.              I haven't had to worry about too many issues. Only a couple minor things. Off       the top of my head, Teamspeak doesn't offer an ARM version of their server       (for gaming, which is hardly used any more anyways, so it doesn't really       matter in the long run), then Jon Justvig's "Legion" door game as well as       Usurper wouldn't compile due to a ton of Intel code. I got Usurper to compile       by removing the Intel specific code, but that made the game very unstable and       unusable. Synchronet had some compiling errors, and when reported were fixed       right away.              Otherwise, I haven't had any issue with setting up binkd/golded/husky type       stuff. So I don't see any major problems as long as it doesn't have a ton of       Intel related stuff.               WvV> I try not to write code that's specific for any target. But it still        WvV> contains a lot of decades old legacy code I never touched. So you never        WvV> know what hidden problems are lurking... ;)              True. And the only way to find out is to jump in! ;)               NB>> Let's just say I would much rather use Makefiles, but if that is not        NB>> possible at the moment.. I can suffer a bit. ;)               WvV> It shouldn't be too difficult to create the make files, but I don't know        WvV> when they will be finished, so if you want to start compiling today,        WvV> that's your only option. ;)              I'm sitting on a barebones 64bit ArchlinuxARM install that I'm not 100% sure       exactly what I want to do with it yet. I do know I want to switch my       Synchronet BBS over to Mystic at some point, but there's no 64bit version       available yet. I could use the 32bit version available for the raspi3, but       that would totally defeat the purpose of the 64bit build. ;)              Still tossing around ideas at the moment. GUIs on the raspi3 makes my single       core AMD 3700+ seem fast, which is why I'm trying to avoid it at all costs. As       a console server, it definitely keeps up with all the tasks I've pushed at it.       It's just that damn resource intensive GUI that drags it down.              I've gone so far as trying out LXDE, XFCE, Linux Mint, Ubuntu (Cinnamon), and       even Fluxbox on this thing when I was using it as a media server.. and I don't       have one good comment about the performance once that GUI is added. ;(              So, I guess for now, keep me near the top of the list. If makefiles happen       before I find a solution, great.. if not.. I may see about running QEMU on my       Windows desktop with an emulated version of the OS I'm using on the raspi3 to       do these tasks, as I would assume it would be a lot faster on a 6-core Intel       with 16gb ram, even if it is emulated.              Regards,       Nick              .... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."              --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52        * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (1:154/10)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca