On 11/20/16, Wilfred van Velzen pondered and said...   
       
    Wv>  Wv>>  PH> and interzonal traffic in this meshed echomail/netmail world   
    Wv>  Wv>> we're   
    Wv>  Wv>>  PH> living in?   
    Wv>  Wv>>   
    Wv>  Wv>> It handles it very well. ;)   
    Wv>    
    Wv>  PH> What does it do?   
    Wv>    
    Wv> What any good tosser does: tossing. We can keep this up for a while. ;)   
    Wv>    
    Wv> I think you need to be more specific...   
      
   I thought I was. I want to know how FMail treats packets when tossing   
   interzone as I read there are known issues with the way FastEcho handles the   
   same situation. What does FMail do such packets, does it create PATH or   
      
    Wv>  PH> It's not the code I want to compare rather the way the end product   
    Wv> operates   
    Wv>  PH> and what it does / does not do/support etc.   
    Wv>    
    Wv> Than you will have to depend on the docs and experience. But that   
    Wv> probably won't tell you the exact details of the dupe checking   
    Wv> algorithme for instance.   
      
   Dupe checking aside I was after some feedback from people (that I figured   
   would be here) who have experience with FMail to be able to offer some   
   qualified thoughts about the features of FMail vs FastEcho (and HTP).   
      
   I've downloaded the latest FMail, I am looking at it to form my own   
   opinions about it ...but it's always nice to hear some thoughts about what it   
   offers from the current maintainer and current users of the software   
      
   It's starting to feel like that's a hard thing to obtain..   
      
   Best, Paul   
      
   --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A31 (Windows)   
    * Origin: Agency BBS | telnet://agency.bbs.geek.nz (3:770/100)