Hello Allen,   
      
   On Monday September 05 2016 05:10, you wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:   
      
    AP> I got a ping/trace from another node and it went into my "unsecured"   
    AP> folder. Unfortunately F_Mail does not have a place to put unsecured in   
    AP> the list so my system did not find it.   
      
   There is a reason fmail does not automatically process mail from the unsecure   
   directory...   
      
      
   I have the following solution:   
      
   1) I fly the MN flag in the nodelist. Signaling that compressed mail will not   
   be automatically processed without prior arrangement. Only raw *.PKT is   
   automatically processed from an unsecure session.   
      
   2) in my mailrcvd.bat I have a line before caliing fmail toss:   
      
      if exist \fido\unsecure\*.pkt move \fido\unsecure\*.pkt \fido\secure\   
      
      
   Works for me.   
      
    AP> I'm wondering if there's a way to make F_Mail pack all outbound   
    AP> netmail / and mail routed through my system as crash mail to the   
    AP> destination?  I'm not sure who is trustworthy to route Zone2 mail   
    AP> reliably through.   
      
   If you are not sure on how to do that, then don't.   
      
      
    AP> I've looked at your documentation and not quite sure the syntax... I   
    AP> can see the "syntax" that most programmers put in their documentation   
    AP> but without seing at least a half dozen examples I get lost.   
      
    AP> I noteiced that I have to put a node in the Fmail to crash the mail to   
    AP> it.   
      
   No, you do not have to enter a node in the fmail node manager to crash mail to   
   it. If the crash mail bit in the message is set, what you have t do is:   
      
      fmailw32 pack * -c   
      
    AP>  I don't trust routing ANYTHING especially Z2 netmails through   
    AP> anything in Z1.   
      
   Then don't...   
      
    AP> Z1 would like you to think that they are organized, but they are NOT.   
    AP> At one time you could route a net's mail through their NC and it would   
    AP> get there... NOT anymore.  I don't know how reliable it is over in Z2   
    AP> but if you route to a nodes NC they may or may not get it where it's   
    AP> supposed to go.   
      
   No comment... ;-)   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111   
    * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555)