Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    FMAIL_HELP    |    Fmail support    |    2,396 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,091 of 2,396    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to Michiel van der Vlist    |
|    Re: Fmail Compression and Decompression    |
|    21 Aug 23 16:33:06    |
      TID: FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0       RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes       TZUTC: 0200       CHRS: UTF-8 2       PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221       MSGID: 2:280/464 64e376c8       REPLY: 2:280/5555 64e35f8e       Hi Michiel,              On 2023-08-21 14:45:17, you wrote to me:               WV>> At the time the choice was made, because rar compressed better. And        WV>> because it still works there is no reason to change this.               MvdV> It is no secret that I am not a member of the "more is better" club. In       the        MvdV> POTS age with high cost of data transport "compressed better" was a       valid        MvdV> argument. Although even then in the end of the compression evolution the        MvdV> added value was so small that it didn't really matter anymore. Is       another        MvdV> one percent of compression efficiency realy worth it.              It was way more then 1%...               MvdV>>> How many in Amiganet still actually use an Amiga?               WV>> Enough...               MvdV> Enough to lkep LAH alive?              Yes.               MvdV>>> The problem with keeping all these antiquaria, is that you also        MvdV>>> have to support it. This will become increasingly difficult        MvdV>>> when the knowledge evaporates...               WV>> This is true for all of Fidonet technology. Keeping this old        WV>> techniques working is partly what makes it interesting...               MvdV> True but at some point one has to make choices that every museum has to        MvdV> make. What do we keep and what do we drop? I see little value in keeping        MvdV> more then one compression method alive for Fidonet. Yes, it is       interesting        MvdV> to keep Fidonet alive. But not ALL of the technology that was ever used.        MvdV> Drop some and focus on keeping the rest alive.              Well, in this case it doesn't matter what you think. It's what the AmigaNet       users want... ;-)              And in a museum available "real" space is probably a lot more expensive then       available "virtual" space in AmigaNet, which is kind of limitless...                     Bye, Wilfred.              --- FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0        * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 80/1 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201       SEEN-BY: 123/131 124/5016 129/305 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 214/22       SEEN-BY: 218/0 1 215 700 720 840 860 880 900 920 221/0 1 6 226/30       SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 307 317 426 428 470 550 664 700       SEEN-BY: 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 291/111       SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 113 123 708 812 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757       SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848       SEEN-BY: 770/1 5020/400       PATH: 280/464 301/1 218/700 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca