Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    FMAIL_HELP    |    Fmail support    |    2,396 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 186 of 2,396    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to mark lewis    |
|    Re: fmail not packing crash-netmail?    |
|    04 Dec 13 09:07:47    |
      Hi mark,              On 03 Dec 13 11:08, mark lewis wrote to Tom De Puysseleyr:        about: "fmail not packing crash-netmail?":               TDP>> Does binkd support unpacked messages? I would assume it doesn't        TDP>> care which type file is specified in the .flo file, it just        TDP>> transfers it to the other side. If that's the case, then the        TDP>> reason would be within fmail...               ml> yes, binkd does and you are right in that it doesn't care what's in the        ml> files... raw PKTs in BSO format have an ?UT extension... CUT are crash,        ml> DUT are direct, i think FUT is normal non-crash non-direct but would have        ml> to dig out the documentation from the original binkleyterm... when these        ml> ?UT files are sent to the remote, they are renamed in transmission to at        ml> least have an extension of PKT so the other side will recognize them...               ml> on the local BSO side, they could also be named PKT but then a ?LO file is        ml> required to point to them for transmission...              That looks about right... ;)              The full specification is here:              http://ftsc.org/docs/fsp-1034.001              (If anyone is interested)              Wilfred.              --- FMail-W32-1.66        * Origin: point@work (2:280/464.112)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca