Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    FMAIL_HELP    |    Fmail support    |    2,396 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,417 of 2,396    |
|    Bill McGarrity to Digital Man    |
|    Re: SBBSecho removing support for ArcMai    |
|    28 Apr 16 08:07:00    |
      -=> Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity <=-               DM> Re: Re: SBBSecho removing support for ArcMail/Attach/FD-style        DM> mailers?        DM> By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Wed Apr 27 2016 06:47 pm               > DM> To simplify the source code and the sysop experience, I'm considering        > DM> *removing* support from SBBSecho v3 for the older ArcMail/Attach/FD        > DM> style mailers. If there is no objection, I'll be doing this pretty soon        > DM> (before the offical "release" of SBBSecho v3.0). This should have no        > DM> impact on sysops that are using SBBSecho with BSO/FLO style mailers,        > DM> which appears to be *every* sysop using SBBSecho today.        >        > To play devil's advocate... (you knew this was coming lol), although        > ArcMail/Attach/FD style is slowing going by the wayside, there are still a        > few who use Internet Rex and FD with NetFoss. Although IRex can do BSO/FLO        > mail as well, most I know using IRex are using ArcMail/Attach/FD mode. They        > may not know you're looking to get rid of it. I'm not sure of the effort        > needed in keeping it within sbbsecho's code but I vote no on removing it.               DM> One way to find out if anyone is using a feature of the software is to        DM> remove it and see who (if anyone) speaks up about it.              If I still had all my nodes setup in Irex I'd do it for you.                > Ultimately, the choice is yours. :)               DM> The problem is that the code to support ArcMail/etc. is most likely        DM> broken. Since no one is complaining, that pretty much assures that no        DM> one is using it. If no one is using it, then there's really no point in        DM> having it.               DM> If I can't get any affirmation that someone is using SBBSecho with an        DM> ArcMail-style mailer today, and willing to test SBBSecho v3 in said        DM> configuration, then I'll be removing the support. I can always add it        DM> back later if/when a sysop that wants to use that mode comes along and        DM> is willing to provide feedback. I have nothing against ArcMail mode, I        DM> just don't want it unnecessarily cluttering up the source code,        DM> documentation, etc. Especially if it's likely not working as is.              Then I guess it's time to bid a farewell to ARCMail... :)              Be well..                     --              Bill              Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net       Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net       FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121       IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697       Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live                     ... Look Twice... Save a Life!!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!!       --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.50        * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca