Hi! Wilfred,   
      
   On 09/09/2017 07:53 AM, you wrote to Nicholas Boel:   
      
    WV>>> echomail.jam was read correctly! (If that wasn't clear yet?) ;)   
      
    NB>> Hmm, what I saw was that echomail.jam was deleted, and his entire   
    NB>> message base was scanned instead of just the area given by   
    NB>> echomail.jam.   
    NB>> Did I miss something?   
      
    WvV> Maybe you're right. ;)   
      
   I see your maybe and raise you a definite.  I did originally report...   
      
   "a sendmail script called for a 'fmail scan' which scanned _every_ message   
   area: netmail, HMB & then JAM.  It seemed to completely ignore the   
   echomail.jam file except when it came time to delete it."   
      
    WvV> I'll gona give Paul a version with the extra logging, so we can find out   
    WvV> for sure...   
      
   Kewl.  More toys!  Thank you.  :)   
      
   Cheers,   
   Paul.   
      
   --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0   
    * Origin: Quinn's Rock vBox - sunny side up on the bookcase (3:640/1384)