Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    FMAIL_HELP    |    Fmail support    |    2,396 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,002 of 2,396    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to Nicholas Boel    |
|    Re: Trialing FMail/lnx status check-in    |
|    08 Sep 17 23:47:59    |
      Hi Nicholas,              On 2017-09-08 15:47:04, you wrote to me:               WV>> It did see it and exported the message to Pauls outbound (if that        WV>> isn't clear yet?)...               NB> Very clear. However, the only reason it was scanned out is because his        NB> FMail scanned _every_ area, rather than just what was in the echomail.jam.              Nope. If I understood Paul correctly, it worked ok, scanning from echomail.jam!               NB>>> I believe I had asked about some better logging when echomail.jam        NB>>> fails too. ;)               WV>> It's there... In the debug version. Just have to clean that up a bit        WV>> for the production version. ;)               NB> Did you give Paul a compiled setup with the updated fmail.c you gave me        NB> that fixed linux paths in echomail.jam?              Yes, it was freshly compiled. But it wasn't a debug version, so it didn't       contain the extra logging...              Bye, Wilfred.              --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815        * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca