Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    FIDOGAZETTE    |    FidoGazette: An Alternative Newsletter    |    8,941 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,099 of 8,941    |
|    August Abolins to Michiel van der Vlist    |
|    This echo    |
|    17 Jan 22 09:20:00    |
      MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet f883c52d       REPLY: 2:280/5555 61e5380e       PID: OpenXP/5.0.51 (Win32)       CHRS: ASCII 1       TZUTC: -0500       Hello Michiel!              ** On Monday 17.01.22 - 10:32, you wrote to me:               M> The principle of "the burden of proof is on the one making        M> the claim" is used in science. That is where I come from.              My understanding of "burden of proof" (BOP) is that it only        comes into play when the claim is of an accusatory nature: in a        dispute. Same thing applies when filing insurance claims,        criminal claims, etc.. All of those types have a root damage        associated with the claim. Sean's claim does not encompass        damages or harm.              Sean's claim was not a dispute. It was a statement. Your        response was accusatory (possibly harmful to character) that        his statement was false, thus the burden was on you.              HOWEVER, I read that BOP can also apply in science where a        certain claim is made, and thus the BOP is on the scientist.        But I doubt that BOP is an issue unless the scientist ends up        in litigation, where a harm is associated with the claim.              This echo transfer matter issue is far from a harmful nature.        And, as I pointed it out it is very easy for Janis to have        communicated the necessary password for elist purposes.        Occam's razor comes to mind. ;) No need to delve into complex        theories of foul play. That's much more complicated.              --        ../|ug              --- OpenXP 5.0.51        * Origin: (2:221/1.58)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 15/0 18/200 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131       SEEN-BY: 153/7715 203/0 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 200 307       SEEN-BY: 229/317 400 424 426 664 700 240/5832 249/206 266/512 280/464       SEEN-BY: 280/5003 282/1038 292/789 854 8125 301/1 317/3 320/219 322/757       SEEN-BY: 335/364 342/200 396/45 410/9 423/81 633/280 712/848       PATH: 221/1 292/854 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca