TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: CP850 2   
   MSGID: 2:280/5555 61e43c19   
   REPLY: 1:3634/12.73 61e2f1ed   
   Hello mark,   
      
   On Saturday January 15 2022 11:10, you wrote to me:   
      
    WD>>>> Janis went completely off-line ... if we can't mail her,   
    WD>>>> neither can you.   
      
    ml>>> yes you can...   
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^   
   So here you claim that we can e-mail Janis.   
      
    ml>>>  she has a gmail account or didn't you know about that?   
      
    MV>> Why should we know about that?   
      
    ml> if you were one of those that might have a need to contact her outside   
    ml> of fidonet, then she would have given it to you...   
      
   And here you claim I can only e-mail her if she gave that e-mail address to   
   me. Well, she didn't. And it works both ways, I see no need for her to contact   
   me oustide Fidonet so I did not give her my e-mail address.   
      
   So you say I can not e-mail her. So out of the windows goes your original   
   claim that I can e-mail her.   
      
   Not that I want or need to. I am not going to e-mail Janis. Because I see no   
   reason, It is Sean that claims he got an e-mail from Janis. The burden of   
   proof is on him.   
      
   Now that I have your attention... For the sake of argument and only for the   
   sake of argument, I have not, nor did I have any intention of actually do   
   this, assume that I had beaten Sean to it.   
      
   Suppose that *I* had posted a message in here claiming the position of   
   moderator of this echo and the position of the editor of the Gazette. Suppose   
   *I* had posted rules stating among other things that EP1 is in force here and   
   that no echolist is accepted as authoritive regarding who is moderator and   
   what are the rules. Suppose *I* had followed up with postings telling   
   participants that their postings are off topic and to take it elsewhere.   
      
   How would you (and Sean) respond to that? Would it be acceptable to you? Would   
   you comply with my rulings?   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303   
    * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 15/0 18/200 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/340   
   SEEN-BY: 123/131 124/5016 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 226/30   
   SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 200 307 317 424 426 664 700 240/5832 249/206   
   SEEN-BY: 249/400 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/789 854 8125   
   SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/234 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 410/9 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250 5019/40   
   SEEN-BY: 5053/58   
   PATH: 280/5555 464 292/854 229/426