Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    FIDOGAZETTE    |    FidoGazette: An Alternative Newsletter    |    8,941 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,765 of 8,941    |
|    NANCY BACKUS to AUGUST ABOLINS    |
|    Re: suitable echos and ho    |
|    12 Nov 19 15:41:00    |
      TID: PX/Win v3.0pr5 PX96-0466M2       MSGID: 1:123/140 73fc3f64       TZUTC: -0500       -=> Quoting August Abolins to Sean Dennis on 11-07-19 21:23 <=-               AA> Yep.. Janis's report is great! I've extolled its virtues in the past.        AA> Decker's HPT Daily Report in the STATS echo is pretty good too,        AA> actually. I assume the list ignores the echos with zero traffic to        AA> show only active echos for the day. That keeps the clutter down very        AA> nicely.               It's a least a good starting point...                AA> However, my whole concern is how is a user or non-sysop supposed to        AA> know what echos are worth participating in.        AA> "Hello User! Now that you have accessed the Fidonet echos, watch         AA> FIDOGAZETTE and STATS echos for clues to which echos are available.        AA> We leave it up to you to figure out which ones have merely robotic        AA> content and which ones strike up conversations with actual people".        AA> :(              My experience has been that there aren't really all that many echoes       that I have enough interest in to check out, so it doesn't really take       long to figure out which are robotic and which are real people...               AA> This is why I thought the 5-step method with the "FIDONET ECHO        AA> ACTIVITY TOOL" I put together at:        AA> http://kolico.ca/fidonet/echos/future4fido/        AA> ...could help, better. The user can narrow down an echo of recent         AA> activity by noting the last post date, and take a sneak peak at the         AA> content.              That could be useful... :)               AA> It's too bad those Sychronet sites don't display the short/official        AA> echo names. Without it, there is another layer of obfuscation for        AA> the user to decode.        AA> As an example, instead of just this:        AA> The Cats_Meow Sanity Check Echo | 134 | Oct-26-19 17:54        AA> Commodore Computer Conference | 426 | Oct-27-19 22:03        AA> Commercial for Sale Echo | 1 | Dec-09-18 23:53        AA> Classic Computers | 204 | Oct-30-19 10:26        AA> Gossip and chit-chat echo | 101 | Jul-07-19 09:17        AA> An extra column for the official echo name would unify the environment        AA> across the many other systems better:        AA> CATS_MEOW : The Cats_Meow Sanity Check Echo| 134 | Oct-26-19 17:54        AA> CBM : Commodore Computer Conference | 426 | Oct-27-19 22:03        AA> CFORSALE : Commercial for Sale Echo | 1 | Dec-09-18 23:53        AA> CLASSIC_COMPUTER: Classic Computers | 204 | Oct-30-19 10:26        AA> COFFEE_KLATSCH : Gossip and chit-chat echo | 101 | Jul-07-19 09:17               That's pretty much something that the bbs software sets up... In my       experience, having gone to many different bbses with all sorts of       different softwares over many years, some will have the official echo       tag along with an explanation, some only the official tag, and others       only the explanation (which as you've found sometimes isn't all that       helpful)...               AA> For a sysop, decoding tables and stats is a no brainer. But I am         AA> approaching this dilema from a first timer's exposure to retro-net |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca