ml> MikeL> Does NETMAIL really have to be set up in only its' own   
    ml> MikeL> GROUP that has only a 'seen by' of the 117/100 HUB     
    ml> MikeL> here?   
      
    ml> i'm not sure i'm understanding your problem, mike...    
    ml> the default general netmail area (that is managed by    
    ml> FE and a dynamic mailer like FD) doesn't have a group    
    ml> assignment...   
      
    ml> can you explain a bit more, please?   
      
    MikeL> I think you may have hit the nail on the head.  As I    
    MikeL> got this whole monstor of 117/100 years ago whne it    
    MikeL> actually was left on the front porch (!) it had a    
    MikeL> "Netmail" enbtry in the FE area lists!  That   
      
   that sounds like a secondary netmail area where netmail is imported into the   
   BBS for users to be able to access it...   
      
    ML> group in which it still 'is' shows that you at 396/345 are shown to   
      
   ahhh... you're confusing me (marK) with the other one (marC) ;)   
      
    MikeL> 'see' it. Which I now think I understand is how    
    MikeL> this junk NetMail stuff may be showing up to you    
    MikeL> on the FTP server connection I poll you from.   
    MikeL> Yes,the traffic goes into a 'hold' que as is    
    MikeL> 'normal' for your traffic outbound.  But you    
    MikeL> shouldn't show up as 'seen by' for this as an    
    MikeL> 'echo' area at all as far as I can understand    
    MikeL> this.   
      
   yeah, i'm not sure without seeing more details... if it is really a NETmail   
   area, there should be NO seen-by lines... VIA lines, yes, but not seen-bys...   
      
      
   )\/(ark   
   member, FastEcho Beta Team   
      
    * Origin:  (1:3634/12)