Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    FDECHO    |    FrontDoor support conference    |    786 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 143 of 786    |
|    Conrad J. Koehler to All    |
|    Quo vadis, FD?    |
|    24 Sep 17 00:47:48    |
      Hi everyone!              Thanks to Ward and JoHo ( hi there! :-) ) I was finally able to enter this       eluded place!        Been a FD sysop only for a short time until I went multi-line. Still being at       school in those old days, happily collecting all old hardware friends' parents       threw away, I bought myself a used (!) MainDoor key and enjoyed the 'Pulse ESC       dos veces para entrar...' for quite a while (2 to 5 years, I do'nt remember).       But I swapped that with McMail when it became clear that it would probably       cease to work properly in the year 19100 and not get fixed. So, what am I       doing here!? Secretly, I kept FrontDoor as my favourite terminal program. It       was incredibly fast on slow machines, kept screen line #25 free for payload       and had a mostly error-free interpretation of AVATAR codes. Ward now brought       me back into Fido, and I'm (slowly.. very slowly) going towards using a       classical POTS EMSI mailer via Telnet. Specifically, in a DOSBox.        JoHo seems to work on the same thing, but I'm not so sure whether or not this       means FD is in development again.        I'd like to stay in touch to try out mutual connectivity of different mailers       in different environments over Telnet, preferring to start out with McMail       for myself, but of course also to see whether a classical DOS FD in an       emulation can still be used - or adaptions would need to be made in either FD       or the emulator.               So, let's see what is possible.        Using FD term in DOSBox gets me disconnected on most Telnet BBSs because they       'detect a port scanner', which I'm certainly not using. In a BBS that doesn't       use such a detection, I can move around as I used to, but there's no way to       get anything via ZModem. The ZModem transfer screen pops up, but it's unable       to transfer a single block. There was no other protocol choice, so I don't yet       know whether this is only ZModem specific. Has anyone more experience? Anyone       know a bunch of good Telnet BBSs that are not so picky? Anyone know a setting       in DOSBox/DOS (env. variable??) that might hold off ZModem from working?               Cheers! :-)               ius       --- AfterShock/Android 1.6.5        * Origin: .-==o[# R o B O t S - B B S #]o==-. (2:292/854.200)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca