home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   ENGLISH_TUTOR      English Tutoring for Students of the Eng      4,347 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,187 of 4,347   
   Ardith Hinton to Anton Shepelev   
   Ru   
   26 Sep 24 22:00:53   
   
   MSGID: 1:153/716.0 6f607405   
   REPLY: 2:221/6.0 66d187fe   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   Hi, Anton!  Recently you wrote in a message to Dallas Hinton:   
      
   DH>  I've never seen the word used as an adjective. I suspect   
   DH>  it's an archaic usage. The Cambridge dictionary doesn't   
   DH>  define it as an adjective (listing only "cowardly"),   
   DH>  same for Merriam-Webster, Collins, and the Britannica   
   DH>  Dictionary. The Oxford dictionary shows it used an   
   DH>  adjective but last used in 1818!   
      
   AS>  1913 Webster lists `coward' as an adjective:   
      
   AS>     
      
      
             My 1983 GAGE CANADIAN DICTIONARY also lists it as an adjective, but   
   in my experience this usage was rare at the time of publication....  :-)   
      
      
      
   AS>  I think `coward' /can/ be an adjective by virtue of the   
   AS>  ability of nouns in English to become adjectives in certain   
   AS>  cirsumstances, such as:   
      
   AS>       systems (vs. systematic) programming   
   AS>       fall guy   
   AS>       finger man   
   AS>       glass (not glassy) jar.   
      
      
                     or   
      
             gravel road   
             pine cone   
             sob sister   
             spider vein   
      
             ... AKA noun adjectives or attributive nouns.  :-)   
      
      
      
   AS>  that said, `coward' is no more an ajective than `widow' in   
   AS>  the famous tautology `widow woman'.   
      
             I ran across "widow woman" as an example of tautology as well.  But   
   in this case "woman" is redundant because a widow is by definition female, and   
   if a male finds himself in a similar position he is a widower where I come   
   from.  :-)   
      
      
      
      
   --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+   
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 4/0 18/0 80/1 88/0 90/0 1 92/1 104/119 105/81 106/201   
   SEEN-BY: 116/116 123/0 10 25 126 180 200 755 3001 129/305 135/115   
   SEEN-BY: 138/146 153/757 7715 154/10 30 50 700 218/700 840 220/90   
   SEEN-BY: 221/1 6 360 222/2 226/18 30 44 50 227/114 229/110 114 206   
   SEEN-BY: 229/300 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 250/1 261/38 266/512   
   SEEN-BY: 275/100 1000 282/1038 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 335/364   
   SEEN-BY: 341/66 200 234 342/11 200 396/45 460/58 712/848 1321 880/1   
   SEEN-BY: 900/0 100 102 106 108 902/0 7 10 19 25 26 27 100 2320/105   
   SEEN-BY: 3634/0 12 27 56 57 58 5019/40 5020/400 1042 5075/35   
   PATH: 153/7715 3634/12 154/10 221/6 341/66 902/26 90/1 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca