MSGID: 2:221/6.0 66cc1c9c   
   REPLY: 1:153/7715.0 6ca0f5d0   
   PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20240505   
   NOTE: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101   
   Thunderbird/31.7.0   
   CHRS: LATIN-1 2   
   TZUTC: 0300   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02   
      
   Hi, Dallas Hinton!   
   I read your message from 24.08.2024 15:44   
      
    AK>> You mean that there is no adjective "coward"?   
      
    AK>> Here for instance,   
    AK>> https://www.dictionary.com/browse/coward   
      
    AK>> PS: And in general, it is an English feature that almost every   
    AK>> word can perform every part of speech.   
      
    DH> I've never seen the word used as an adjective. I suspect it's an   
    DH> archaic usage. The Cambridge dictionary doesn't define it as an   
    DH> adjective (listing only "cowardly"), same for Merriam-Webster,   
    DH> Collins, and the Britannica Dictionary. The Oxford dictionary shows   
    DH> it used an adjective but last used in 1818!   
      
   Coward is a noun. Amen! ;-)   
   https://thecontentauthority.com/blog/coward-vs-cowardly   
      
   Bye, Dallas!   
   Alexander Koryagin   
   english_tutor 2024   
      
   ---    
    * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 129/305   
   SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 154/10 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 700 720 840 850   
   SEEN-BY: 218/860 870 880 930 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 114   
   SEEN-BY: 229/206 300 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 266/512 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 301/1 113 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 234 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 712/848 5020/400 1042 5075/35   
   PATH: 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426