MSGID: 1:153/7715.0 6ca0f5d0   
   REPLY: 2:221/6.0 66c9ef80   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   Hi, Alexander -- on Aug 24 2024 at 17:34, you wrote:   
      
      
   AK> You mean that there is no adjective "coward"?   
      
   AK> Here for instance,   
   AK> https://www.dictionary.com/browse/coward   
      
   AK> PS: And in general, it is an English feature that almost every word   
   AK> can perform every part of speech.   
      
   I've never seen the word used as an adjective. I suspect it's an archaic   
   usage. The Cambridge dictionary doesn't define it as an adjective (listing   
   only "cowardly"), same for Merriam-Webster, Collins, and the Britannica   
   Dictionary. The Oxford dictionary shows it used an adjective but last used in   
   1818!   
      
      
   Cheers... Dallas   
      
   --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+   
    * Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, CANADA (1:153/7715)   
   SEEN-BY: 4/0 80/1 88/0 90/0 1 92/1 105/81 106/201 129/305 134/100   
   SEEN-BY: 138/146 153/148 149 151 757 7715 154/10 218/700 840 221/1   
   SEEN-BY: 221/6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 114 206 300 317 426 428   
   SEEN-BY: 229/470 664 700 261/38 266/512 275/100 1000 282/1038 291/111   
   SEEN-BY: 301/1 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 200 234 342/11 200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 1321 880/1 900/0 100 102 106 108 902/0 7 10   
   SEEN-BY: 902/19 25 26 27 100 3634/12 5019/40 5020/400 1042 5075/35   
   PATH: 153/7715 757 221/6 341/66 902/26 90/1 229/426