REPLY: 2:221/6.0 65716e10   
   MSGID: 2:5023/24.4222 6571920c   
   CHRS: CP866 2   
   TZUTC: 0400   
   Hello Alexander,   
      
    Alexander Koryagin <2:221/6> vs. me:   
      
    GH>> "...Nutella has become out comfort food, we like it with banana   
    GH>> or pretzels."   
    AK> Nutella is like ice-cream, it is understandable.   
      
   Sure.   
      
    AK> out ?-> our   
      
   It's just a silly typo, alright.   
   Damn, I checked that very msg 3 times. How could it creep in? I suspect   
   someone's tosser did that. Also my work keyboard sucks. :-[   
      
    AK> banana ?-> bananas   
      
   This is it.   
   It's supposed to be exactly "we like it with banana".   
   Alas, "banana" can be uncountable.   
      
    GH>> On the other hand, mentioned as a dish, like a menu item you may   
    GH>> order in a cafe or restaurant, it should be referred to as   
    GH>> countable:   
    GH>> "...They got a cherry pie there that'll kill ya!"   
    GH>> So, again, it's complicated.   
    AK> I think that the matter is simpler. When they say in the dictionary   
    AK> that pie is both countable and uncountable in use they just mean that   
    AK> you _can_ put an indefinite article before "pie", or you are free not   
    AK> to put it.   
      
   It depends on the context. Not having a similar concept in our language, this   
   is quite hard for us to grasp, it's never simple. :-)   
   But it doesn't work just at random, as you'd expect.   
      
    AK> The same situation with steak:   
    AK> "I had steak and kidney pie with chips"   
    AK> but probably is also correct   
    AK> "I had a steak and (a) kidney pie with chips"   
      
   I'm afraid you got it wrong here.   
   "Steak & kidney pie" is "one entity".   
      
   ========   
   Steak and kidney pie is a popular British dish. It is a savoury pie filled   
   principally with a mixture of diced beef, diced kidney (which may be beef,   
   lamb, veal, or pork) and onion. (google)   
   ========   
      
   Thus, the first one is the correct usage, the second makes no sense.   
      
    AK> I also suspect that the more the speech is informal the less articles   
    AK> it contains. ;-)   
      
   I don't think there's such a connection, or dependency. But without tutors   
   it's getting hard to settle this kind of dispute. :-)   
      
   Again, I could try to explain the usage via some abstractions (this is how I   
   believe it works):   
      
   1. Mom: texts "Did you eat?"   
    Son: "Yeah sure"   
    M: "What was it"   
    S: "Steak and kidney pie with chips"   
    M: "Good"   
      
   2. Friend: asks "So last night you went to that restaurant?"   
    Me: "Yeah"   
    F: "How was it?"   
    M: "Great, I had a steak and kidney pie, at last"   
    F: "THAT pie? For real? With chips?"   
    M: "Yeah, it's something else! Highly recommended."   
      
   Do you realize the difference between those two? Both are casual dialogue   
   instances that can occur everyday everywhere.   
      
      
   --   
   WBR, Gleb    
   --- GoldED+/W64-MSVC 1.1.5   
    * Origin: Type to continue (2:5023/24.4222)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 123/131   
   SEEN-BY: 128/260 129/305 153/7715 154/10 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 700   
   SEEN-BY: 218/720 840 850 860 870 880 930 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 206 307 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 250/25   
   SEEN-BY: 266/512 282/1038 291/111 301/1 113 320/219 322/757 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 450/1024 460/58 463/68 467/888 712/848 5000/111 5001/100   
   SEEN-BY: 5005/49 5015/42 46 255 5019/40 5020/400 570 715 830 846 1042   
   SEEN-BY: 5020/4441 5022/2 5023/12 24 5030/49 5034/13 5053/51 5054/8   
   SEEN-BY: 5058/104 5061/15 133 5075/35 128 5080/102 5083/1 444 5090/958   
   SEEN-BY: 6035/3   
   PATH: 5023/24 5020/715 1042 301/1 218/700 229/426   
      
|