MSGID: 2:5075/128.130 0a96c49b   
   REPLY: 2:221/6.0 63359054   
   CHRS: CP866 2   
   RFC: 1 0   
   RFC-Message-ID:    
   RFC-References:     
   TZUTC: 0300   
   PID: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Th   
   nderbird/78.6.1   
   TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-g97f4003   
   Hi Anton Shepelev!   
   I read your message on 30-Sep-2022   
      
     AK>> Simplification of English is a long life tendency. The simpler you   
     AK>> speak the bigger auditory listens to you. ;)   
      
     AS> But gaining a big audience is an evil purpose fit for social-   
     AS> network parasites and like-collectors, software giants, general   
     AS> money suckers, and vain people. It breeds generation upon   
     AS> generation of lazy, clueless, benighted, tasteless, uncultured   
     AS> people unwilling to learn and nurtured upon surrogates of art and   
     AS> knowledge. A creator or artist that fawns upon his audience has   
     AS> betrayed himself. His work is always false.   
      
   Most ugly and violent ideas can be expressed in a perfect language. Yes,    
   the idea is the main thing. And if you want to teach somebody, IMHO it    
   will be good to do it with maximum clarity and as simpler as possible.    
   You can take any lesson on any subject -- if a teacher chooses a    
   complicated way of explanation instead of a simple one he will get his    
   aim unlikely. And, besides, the beauty of languages correlated little    
   with the number words you use in your story. Another main idea IMHO is    
   that you should use words in a proper time. As if they are musical cords.   
      
     AK>> In English a great lot of words sound similarly, but the context   
     AK>> of the phrase usually gets the clue. Probably, not only the   
     AK>> context, but even the "melody" of phrase.   
      
     AS> I believe context, intonation, rhythm, and melody crucial to all   
     AS> languages, yet it is a poor justifiction for vulgar simplification   
     AS> of language itself to the detriment of its beauty and   
     AS> expressiveness.   
      
   First, of it should be understood which is the target of your art. The    
   artists are divided in two groups -- first one knows their auditory,    
   fawns it, as you put it;  second one doesn't pay any attention on people    
   opinions and does art for the sake of process (art).   
      
   Bye Anton!   
   Alexander   
   english_tutor 2022   
   -=<{Linux Astra - Thunderbird 78.6.1 - akReformator_lx}>=-   
   --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1   
    * Origin: Usenet Network (2:5075/128.130)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 15/0 16/0 19/10 37 50/109 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340   
   SEEN-BY: 123/130 131 129/305 153/7715 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 360 227/114   
   SEEN-BY: 229/110 111 112 113 206 317 424 426 428 470 664 700 240/5832   
   SEEN-BY: 250/25 266/512 280/5003 282/1038 301/1 317/3 320/119 219   
   SEEN-BY: 320/319 322/0 757 335/364 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/81   
   SEEN-BY: 450/1024 460/58 463/68 467/888 712/848 4500/1 5000/111 5001/100   
   SEEN-BY: 5005/49 5015/42 46 5019/40 5020/830 846 1042 4441 5030/49   
   SEEN-BY: 5053/51 5058/104 5064/56 5075/35 128 5080/102 5083/1 444   
   SEEN-BY: 5090/958   
   PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 221/6 1 320/219 229/426