MSGID: 1:153/716.0 2282a312   
   REPLY: 1:3634/12.73 621e09d1   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   Hi, Mark!  Recently you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton:   
      
   ml>  i just wasn't sure of the proper pluralization form for    
   ml>  "flu" and went with the more common usage of adding "es"...   
      
      
              Ah.  I wasn't sure I'd ever seen it pluralized before, but I see no   
   reason why it can't be.  Common usage varies from time to time & from place to   
   place & YMMV.  When I get essentially the same answers from US + UK + Canadian   
   sources I tend to regard the authors' findings as standard English.   
      
              With words like "potato" & "octopus" the dictionary tells us how to   
   pluralize them, and sometimes we do it by adding "-es".  If we add "-es" where   
   it isn't needed, though, we may confuse other members of the audience....  :-Q   
      
      
      
      
   --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+   
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 129/305 330   
   SEEN-BY: 129/331 138/146 153/757 7715 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/206 317 424 426 428 664 700 240/5832 266/512 275/100   
   SEEN-BY: 275/1000 282/1038 301/1 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/11 200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 640/1321 712/848 3634/12   
   PATH: 153/7715 229/426