home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   ENGLISH_TUTOR      English Tutoring for Students of the Eng      4,347 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,684 of 4,347   
   Ardith Hinton to Anton Shepelev   
   `Several' misapplied?   
   30 Mar 21 23:20:13   
   
   MSGID: 1:153/716.0 063e5c97   
   REPLY: 2:221/6.0 606100a2   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   Hi, Anton!  Recently you wrote in a message to All:   
      
   AS>  The chief of a computer-science laboratory where my   
   AS>  friend works condemned his usage of the word `several'   
   AS>  in the the following sentence:   
      
   AS>  We present several new piecewise-polynomial kernels   
   AS>  for image interpolation.   
      
   AS>  on the ground that it is a typical mistake made by   
   AS>  those who learned English in a Russian school. Perhaps   
   AS>  I was not sufficiently diligent in the English classes   
   AS>  of my Russian school,   
      
      
             Don't sell yourself short!  IMHO this individual's reaction probably   
   says more about him or her than it does about you....  :-Q   
      
      
      
   AS>  but I see no fault in that sentence, except maybe for   
   AS>  a missing introductory phrase, such as "In this article,   
   AS>  we present..." Do you?   
      
      
             No.  But I can see how some folk might have a wonderful time arguing   
   about the precise numbers involved when we use terms like "a couple", "a few",   
   "several", and "many".  In informal speech "a couple" can mean two or three...   
   and within certain limits the other terms also refer to an unspecified number.   
      
             How many kernels was your friend offering?  If the actual number was   
   more than two or three but fewer than "many" he or she used the term "several"   
   quite correctly, according to a couple of English dictionaries I read.  Mark &   
   Dallas & I also agree on this.  However, one source says "more than two".  :-)   
      
      
      
      
   --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+   
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 106/127 120/340 123/131 129/305 138/146   
   SEEN-BY: 153/105 250 757 802 7715 154/10 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 702   
   SEEN-BY: 229/101 424 426 664 700 1016 1017 240/1120 1634 1895 2100   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5138 5411 5824 5832 5853 8001 8002 8005 249/206 317 261/38   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 282/1038 313/41 317/3 320/219 322/757 331/313 333/808   
   SEEN-BY: 335/206 364 370 342/11 200 371/52 382/147 2454/119 3634/12   
   SEEN-BY: 4500/1 5020/1042   
   PATH: 153/7715 757 221/6 335/364 240/1120 5832 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca