MSGID: 2:221/6.0 6038a396
REPLY: 2:221/6.0 60357f36
PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20201225
CHRS: UTF-8 4
TZUTC: 0200
TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2021-02-17
Hi, Anton Shepelev! -> Alexander Koryagin
I read your message from 24.02.2021 01:18
AK>> You don't understand -- most Russian people should gain skills in
AK>> quick word processing if they want to understand quick English
AK>> speech.
AS> First, your recommendation is not entirely exact, because learners
AS> need to train their speech-recognition (word-processing, as you
AS> call them) skills in the language they are learning. There is no
AS> such thing as the general, languageagnostic speech-recognition
AS> skills. Second, your advice is true for any other learner of any
AS> other language.
I just told my thoughts on this account, to fill empty lines. ;-) Although the
fact that Englishmen talk words quicker than Russians is obvious when we watch
American movies.
AS>>> I should never recommend this with real speech, because that way
AS>>> you lose all emotional content. While remastering
AK>> When my aim is focused on training my speed skills I don't pay too
AK>> much attention on such details.
AS> Good for you, but I grow bored and disgusted when exposed to
AS> second-rate content. When the material is good, however, learning
AS> anything becomes a pleasure.
For instance, when I read textbooks I have no pleasure, but I know they are
useful. A great subject is not necessary. For instance, I read now
"The Gun Seller" by Hugh Laurie. A usual not very bright subject, but the
language is super, great, marvellous and original. I enjoy it, and I strongly
recommend you to read it.
AK>> Besides -- you can watch two time more shows and movies.
AS> Good for you, but I go for quality instead of quantity.
I train my hearing skills, forgot?
AK>> It is shame to spend time watching serials - >
AS> I should agree if your sentence ended here, but you continue:
AK>> - > in Russian, but if you speed them up you waste less time and
AK>> get more hearing skills.
AS> You mean TV series? English or Russian ones? In my opinion, TV
AS> series almost never rise to the level of art and remain a sort of
AS> cultural cud.
Somebody in heaven and under earth like serials very much. All life on Earth
is a big serial. Besides, there are some serials in Russia which are very
pretty, stylish and certainly are worth to be seen once. For instance, the
serial about a cool, stylish Russian fashion firm and quite ugly, but very
clever girl who went to work there. Speed it up by 1.5 times and you will have
a good hearing training, without boredom.
AS> I did moderately enjoy "Downton Abbey", though, when
AS> it was screened on our "Kultura" channel, ad-free. Most good TV
AS> series are by today's measures either very short or otherwise non-
AS> conventional, e.g. the original Rod Serling's "Twilight Zone", or
AS> Tatiana Lioznova's "Seventeen moments in spring."
Certainly I have some reserve if I buy a new TV set. ;-)
AK>> IMHO, first, a learner should learn how to hear and understand
AK>> quick speech. Then he can enjoy emotions.
AS> I beg to differ, for emotions facilitate both understanding and
AS> learing.
You can try to be emotional and waste less time. In general watching TV is a
waste of time whatever you watch. ;-)
Bye, Anton!
Alexander Koryagin
english_tutor 2021
---
* Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 129/305 221/1 6 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 664 1016 1017 240/1120 1634 1895
SEEN-BY: 240/2100 5138 5411 5832 5853 8001 8002 8005 249/206 317 261/38
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 313/41 317/3 320/219 322/757 331/313 333/808 335/206
SEEN-BY: 335/364 370 342/200 371/52 382/147 2454/119 4500/1 5020/1042
PATH: 221/6 335/364 240/1120 5832 229/426
|
