home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   ENGLISH_TUTOR      English Tutoring for Students of the Eng      4,347 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,239 of 4,347   
   Dallas Hinton to Wayne Harris   
   Misinterprestation   
   02 Aug 20 20:51:12   
   
   MSGID: 1:153/7715.0 f278d410   
   REPLY: 2:221/6.0 5f2724aa   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   Hi Wayne -- on Aug 02 2020 at 23:40, you wrote:   
      
   WH> If I may, let me ask some questions.  My intuition says I should always   
   WH> isolate a vocative in between commas.  ``Hi, Anton.''  However, I pretty   
   WH> much never see anyone writing that way.  Isn't that a grammar rule?   
      
   The vocative comma use varies with formality. For a good explanation,   
   see https://www.macmillandictionaryblog.com/hello-vocative-comma -- but the   
   quick and dirty explanation is that in informal writing it's optional.   
   IMO, the only time it absolutely must be used (in order to ensure clarity) is   
   in a   
   sentence such as "I'm fighting John" which is different from "I'm   
   fighting, John".   
      
   Gmail seems happy to fill in (autofill) text (at least in the Windows   
   version on a PC). If I address a message to Frank, and begin typing   
   Hi it writes "Hi Frank", but if I type Hi, it leaves the   
   text alone. Make of that what you will! :-)   
      
   WH> You wrote ``furthermore, [...]''.  That also matches my intuition.  But   
   WH> I often see people ignoring this comma.  Perhaps this is an optional   
   WH> comma.  Is it?  What is the book you go to to cite such rules?   
      
   This is called a conjunctive adverb, and the rule seems to be that you   
   always have a comma after a conjunctive adverb.   
      
   The books Ardith and I use most are the 2000 "New Fowler's Modern   
   English Usage" and the 2016 "Garner's Modern English Usage". Fowler's   
   tends more toward British usage and Garner seems more American. Here in   
   Canada, of course, we're bilingual. :-)   
      
      
   Cheers... Dallas   
      
   --- timEd/NT 1.30+   
    * Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, CANADA (1:153/7715)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 18/0 19/10 90/1 116/116 120/340 601 123/0 25 50   
   SEEN-BY: 123/131 150 170 180 755 135/300 138/146 153/250 757 7715   
   SEEN-BY: 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 275   
   SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 664 1014 240/1120 1634 1895 2100 5138 5832 5853   
   SEEN-BY: 240/8001 8002 8005 249/206 317 261/38 280/5003 5006 313/41   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 342/200 382/147 423/81 460/58   
   SEEN-BY: 640/1138 1321 1384 712/848 2454/119 3634/0 12 15 27 50   
   PATH: 153/7715 3634/12 640/1384 221/1 280/5003 240/1120 5832 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca