Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ENGLISH_TUTOR    |    English Tutoring for Students of the Eng    |    4,347 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,117 of 4,347    |
|    Anton Shepelev to Ardith Hinton    |
|    A pigeon simile... 1.    |
|    01 May 20 20:04:54    |
      MSGID: 2:221/6.0 5eac56b2       REPLY: 1:153/716.0 eab7d420       PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20200418       EID: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf)       CHRS: CP437 2       TZUTC: 0300       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2020-04-15       Ardith Hinton to Anton Shepelev:              > AH> I'm reminded here of Jacqueline Susann's novel VALLEY       > AH> OF THE DOLLS, where women in particular were given pills       > AH> which may have made them feel better temporarily but       > AH> which did not address the underlying problem(s).       >       > AS> [A learner's question:]       > AS> I never became friendly with this consturction: may have       > AS> made. Does it mean "it is possible that they made"? If so,       > AS> is it correct to use the present tense to describe events       > AS> in a novel introduced in the past tense (were given)?       >       > It is possible [that] they made the users feel better       > temporarily... yes. Either way the events of the story are in       > the past tense, and whatever we write in the preamble has far       > more to do with our own reasoning processes.              Thanks, I mean what you see (or the other way round).              > One of the things which may be confusing you here is an idiomatic       > use of "it". ;-)              In "it is possible that..."? I have no problems with this dummy `it'       that I wot of... If, however, you refer to the error I made in a       tag quesion that you so kindly corrected in another post, that was       just a mental misstep (here is another alliteration for you).              > While I don't know of any formal scientific studies on       > the topic I'd highly recommend Bernie Siegel's book LOVE,       > MEDICINE & MIRACLES. The author is an oncologist who noticed       > that some of his patients appeared to be doing better than       > expected, and made it his business to figure out why. Over the       > years I've noticed similar comments from various other front line       > workers as well.... :-)              That is certainly interesting. Our minds are have stronger effect       on our bodies than is usually thought, what with stigmae and the       yogi. As a nurse told me during a regular medical inspection at the       university, all illnesses are because of the nerves, and only one       because of love :-)              ---         * Origin: nntps://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 120/340 601 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/101 426       SEEN-BY: 229/664 1014 240/1120 1634 2100 5138 5832 5853 8001 8002       SEEN-BY: 240/8005 249/206 317 261/38 280/5003 313/41 317/3 320/219       SEEN-BY: 322/757 331/313 333/808 335/206 364 342/200 382/147 2454/119       SEEN-BY: 4500/1 5020/1042       PATH: 221/6 335/364 240/1120 5832 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca