home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   ENGLISH_TUTOR      English Tutoring for Students of the Eng      4,347 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,117 of 4,347   
   Anton Shepelev to Ardith Hinton   
   A pigeon simile... 1.   
   01 May 20 20:04:54   
   
   MSGID: 2:221/6.0 5eac56b2   
   REPLY: 1:153/716.0 eab7d420   
   PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20200418   
   EID: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf)   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   TZUTC: 0300   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2020-04-15   
   Ardith Hinton to  Anton Shepelev:   
      
   > AH>  I'm reminded here of Jacqueline Susann's novel VALLEY   
   > AH>  OF THE DOLLS, where women in particular were given pills   
   > AH>  which may have made them feel better temporarily but   
   > AH>  which did not address the underlying problem(s).   
   >   
   > AS>  [A learner's question:]   
   > AS>  I never became friendly with this consturction: may have   
   > AS>  made. Does it mean "it is possible that they made"? If so,   
   > AS>  is it correct to use the present tense to describe events   
   > AS>  in a novel introduced in the past tense (were given)?   
   >   
   >            It is possible [that] they made the users feel better   
   > temporarily... yes.  Either way the events of the story are in   
   > the past tense, and whatever we write in the preamble has far   
   > more to do with our own reasoning processes.   
      
   Thanks, I mean what you see (or the other way round).   
      
   > One of the things which may be confusing you here is an idiomatic   
   > use of "it".  ;-)   
      
   In "it is possible that..."? I have no problems with this dummy `it'   
   that I wot of... If, however, you refer to the error I made in a   
   tag quesion that you so kindly corrected in another post, that was   
   just a mental misstep (here is another alliteration for you).   
      
   >            While I don't know of any formal scientific studies on   
   > the topic I'd highly recommend Bernie Siegel's book LOVE,   
   > MEDICINE & MIRACLES.  The author is an oncologist who noticed   
   > that some of his patients appeared to be doing better than   
   > expected, and made it his business to figure out why.  Over the   
   > years I've noticed similar comments from various other front line   
   > workers as well....  :-)   
      
   That is certainly interesting. Our minds are have stronger effect   
   on our bodies than is usually thought, what with stigmae and the   
   yogi. As a nurse told me during a regular medical inspection at the   
   university, all illnesses are because of the nerves, and only one   
   because of love :-)   
      
   ---    
    * Origin: nntps://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 120/340 601 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/101 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 1014 240/1120 1634 2100 5138 5832 5853 8001 8002   
   SEEN-BY: 240/8005 249/206 317 261/38 280/5003 313/41 317/3 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 331/313 333/808 335/206 364 342/200 382/147 2454/119   
   SEEN-BY: 4500/1 5020/1042   
   PATH: 221/6 335/364 240/1120 5832 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca