Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ENGLISH_TUTOR    |    English Tutoring for Students of the Eng    |    4,347 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,023 of 4,347    |
|    Anton Shepelev to Mike Powell    |
|    Why is the apostrophe use    |
|    06 Apr 20 00:40:16    |
      MSGID: 2:221/6.0 5e8a503a       REPLY: 965.englisht@1:2320/105 22ef4d39       PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20200226       EID: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf)       CHRS: IBMPC 2       TZUTC: 0300       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-12-05       Mike Powell - DENIS MOSKO:              > > @MSGID: <5E89F31C.964.englisht@capitolcityonline.net>       > > David said, "Today we shall all be working hard, don't slack       > > off".       >       > > David said, 'Today we shall all be working hard, don't slack       > > off'.       >       > > See how silly the second one is, using the same punctuation       > > mark for the missing letter in don't as for what David spoke?       >       > I do not think that the second one is correct for how one would       > normally punctuate that sentence in English.              Especially in ASCII, where the same character plays the roles of       the apostrophe and of the opening single quotation mark.              > We would normally use the double-quote as in the first example.       > We would also put the period at the end inside of the second       > double-quote mark.              inside *of*? I think that `inside' is a complete preposition by       itself. The placement of the full stop insde the quotation is more       beautiful than outside it, whereas the logically correct       punctuation is the ugliest:              David said "Today we shall all be working hard, don't slack off.".              Both the quoted and quoting sentences shall have their terminating       punctuation. No comma is logically required after `said' because       David's utternace is its direct object.              David's request sounds rather illogical after the promise of hard       work, unless is addressed to someone wihtout the group to which       "we" refers...              ---         * Origin: nntps://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/101 426 1014 240/1120       SEEN-BY: 240/1634 2100 5138 5832 5853 8001 8002 8005 249/206 317 261/38       SEEN-BY: 280/5003 313/41 317/3 320/219 322/757 333/808 335/206 364       SEEN-BY: 342/200 382/147 2454/119 4500/1 5020/1042       PATH: 221/6 335/364 240/1120 5832 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca