home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   ENGLISH_TUTOR      English Tutoring for Students of the Eng      4,347 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,023 of 4,347   
   Anton Shepelev to Mike Powell   
   Why is the apostrophe use   
   06 Apr 20 00:40:16   
   
   MSGID: 2:221/6.0 5e8a503a   
   REPLY: 965.englisht@1:2320/105 22ef4d39   
   PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20200226   
   EID: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf)   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   TZUTC: 0300   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-12-05   
   Mike Powell - DENIS MOSKO:   
      
   > > @MSGID: <5E89F31C.964.englisht@capitolcityonline.net>   
   > > David said, "Today we shall all be working hard, don't slack   
   > > off".   
   >   
   > > David said, 'Today we shall all be working hard, don't slack   
   > > off'.   
   >   
   > > See how silly the second one is, using the same punctuation   
   > > mark for the missing letter in don't as for what David spoke?   
   >   
   > I do not think that the second one is correct for how one would   
   > normally punctuate that sentence in English.   
      
   Especially in ASCII, where the same character plays the roles of   
   the apostrophe and of the opening single quotation mark.   
      
   > We would normally use the double-quote as in the first example.   
   > We would also put the period at the end inside of the second   
   > double-quote mark.   
      
   inside *of*?  I think that `inside' is a complete preposition by   
   itself. The placement of the full stop insde the quotation is more   
   beautiful than outside it, whereas the logically correct   
   punctuation is the ugliest:   
      
   David said "Today we shall all be working hard, don't slack off.".   
      
   Both the quoted and quoting sentences shall have their terminating   
   punctuation.  No comma is logically required after `said' because   
   David's utternace is its direct object.   
      
   David's request sounds rather illogical after the promise of hard   
   work, unless is addressed to someone wihtout the group to which   
   "we" refers...   
      
   ---    
    * Origin: nntps://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/101 426 1014 240/1120   
   SEEN-BY: 240/1634 2100 5138 5832 5853 8001 8002 8005 249/206 317 261/38   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 313/41 317/3 320/219 322/757 333/808 335/206 364   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 382/147 2454/119 4500/1 5020/1042   
   PATH: 221/6 335/364 240/1120 5832 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca