TID: FMail-lnx32 2.1.0.18-B20170905   
   TZUTC: 1000   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   MSGID: 3:640/1384 5de4e433   
   REPLY: 2:221/360.0 5de4dca4   
   Hi! Alexander,   
      
   On 02 Dec 19 11:43, you wrote to Ardith Hinton:   
      
    AK>>> I also don't see any evidence indicating Annabel had been   
    AK>>> employed in the same capacity, but IMHO also there is no ground   
    AK>>> to suggest that a stenographer is as unique position in a firm   
    AK>>> as its President.   
      
    AH>>                      |is in as unique a position   
      
    AK> Maybe it is better to remove "position"?:   
    AK> "...but, IMHO, also there is no ground to suggest that a stenographer   
    AK> is as unique in a firm as its President."   
      
   You're getting a little lost.  The statement is one of fact.  In days long   
   past there was a time of one-to-one direct professional relationships between   
   a senior executive (say, president) and the organisation's (sole) stenographer.   
      
   A good stenographer is worth a dozen typists.  That is to say, a good   
   stenographer would take systematically evaluating a dozen typists, and even   
   then that dozen may fail to possess the required skills.   
      
   In days of old, I had a 24 year long career and knew of only two stenographers   
   at that workplace.   
      
   Cheers,   
   Paul.   
      
   ... In memory of a hero: Vicky Taylor, 5 February 1945.   
   --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20130515   
    * Origin: Quinn's Rock - Live from Paul's Xubuntu desktop! (3:640/1384)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 90/1 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 227/114 229/354 426 1014   
   SEEN-BY: 240/100 1120 1634 2100 5138 5832 5853 8001 8002 8005 249/206   
   SEEN-BY: 249/317 261/38 280/5003 5006 313/41 317/3 320/219 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 335/364 342/200 382/147 423/81 460/58 640/1138 1321 1384   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 2454/119 3634/12   
   PATH: 640/1384 221/1 280/5003 240/1120 5832 229/426