Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ENGLISH_TUTOR    |    English Tutoring for Students of the Eng    |    4,347 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,879 of 4,347    |
|    Ardith Hinton to Alexander Koryagin    |
|    A rule needed :)    |
|    30 Nov 19 23:35:46    |
      MSGID: 1:153/716.0 de344560       REPLY: 2:221/360.0 5db92ffa       CHRS: IBMPC 2       Hi, Alexander! Awhile ago you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton:              AK> I also don't see any evidence indicating Annabel       AK> had been employed in the same capacity, but IMHO       AK> also there is no ground to suggest that a stenographer       AK> is as unique position in a firm as its President.        |is in as unique a position                      The title of "president" certainly sounds more formal, and is often       capitalized. With other job titles, however, the situation may be less clear.       "Secretary of State" is an official role which is held by only one person at a       time... yet the word "secretary" may be used to describe any of four employees       in a large high school. The question in my mind is whether or not the article       can correctly be omitted if I'm referring to the secretary, teacher-librarian,       etc. at a much smaller school... or to the proprietor of Giovanni's Bistro. I       must say I found the omission of the article in your example surprising, but I       can see justfication for it if it's optional there & the novelist wants to get       on with the show ASAP after filling in a bit of the background.... :-)                      Four centuries ago, other writers left out "the" in:                      Where is he that is born King of the Jews?        -- Matt. 2:2, KJV                      The Tragedie of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark        -- Wm. Shakespeare                     We could have a great time discussing why Herod saw Jesus as a potential rival       and whether or not Hamlet was the last of his line, but my point is that AFAIK       native speakers of English have been leaving out "the" in situations where the       rationale is not immediately obvious for quite awhile now. The rule you cited       mentions two important factors... the uniqueness of the job & the formality of       the job description. In everyday life things may not be quite so simple. But       as long as you know rules have exceptions I can't think of a better one. :-))                                   --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+        * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 90/1 227/114 229/354 426 1014 240/100 1120 1634       SEEN-BY: 240/2100 5138 5832 5853 8001 8002 8005 249/206 317 261/38       SEEN-BY: 280/5003 313/41 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 342/200 382/147       SEEN-BY: 2454/119       PATH: 153/7715 261/38 240/1120 5832 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca