MSGID: 1:153/716.0 daa45f75   
   REPLY: 2:221/6.0 5da6c7ac   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   Hi, Alexander!  Recently you wrote in a message to mark lewis:   
      
   AK>  Hi, Mark Lewis!   
   AK>  I read your message from 14.10.2019 16:26   
      
   AK>  This is a test of X-COMMENT-TO kludge - my previous   
   AK>  answer were for some reason to all.   
               |was   
      
      
               Your kludge appears to be working now... as I imagine you can see   
   for yourself.  I was able to verify easily what you were concerned about here   
   because my message editor linked this message to previous exchanges regarding   
   the same topic.  But much more important... because we have no way of knowing   
   whether or not other people's software can do likewise... is that you told us   
   *in the body of your message* who you were replying to & when they posted the   
   relevant material.  AAMOF this system works so well that I get the drift even   
   if, e.g., the author forgets a toggle & the info is in Dutch or Swedish.  ;-)   
      
               What matters to me is keeping track of who said what to whom, and   
   various methods may be employed.  Thanks for showing us two of them....  :-))   
      
      
      
      
   --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+   
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/19 120 123 15/2 16/0 18/0 116/116 120/544 123/0 25 50 130   
   SEEN-BY: 123/131 150 755 135/300 138/146 153/250 757 7715 154/10 203/0   
   SEEN-BY: 221/0 1 6 360 227/114 229/354 426 1014 240/1120 2100 5138   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5832 5853 249/206 317 261/38 280/5003 300/4 317/3 320/119   
   SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/0 757 342/200 460/58 640/1138 1321 1384 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 2454/119 3634/0 12 15 24 27 50   
   PATH: 153/7715 3634/12 640/1384 221/1 320/219 240/5832 229/426