TID: FMail-lnx32 2.1.0.18-B20170905   
   TZUTC: 1000   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   MSGID: 3:640/1384 5d7f7dd0   
   REPLY: 2:221/6.0 5d7f6720   
   Hi! Alexander,   
      
   On 16 Sep 19 13:42, you wrote to me:   
      
    AK>>> How can you put on a turned inside out T-shirt correctly without   
    AK>>> turning it inside in beforehand?   
    AK>>> The answer: uoy dluohs tup no ti eciwt   
    AK>>> ;-)   
    PQ>> Try: "uoy dluohs tup ti no eciwt". Much better. 8-)   
      
    AK> What about the first sentence (the question)? Should I put "on" behind   
    AK> "T-Shirt"? It seems in this case "on" will be very far from "put".   
      
   It's quite correct as is.  Anything else ends up being quite convoluted,   
      
   On a matter of (my) personal style I might have used "inside-out" and   
   "inside-in", as I think it makes the _state_ of the garment more apprent.    
   It's kind of a mental 'N.B' (Latin) ... "uh-oh, it's not just a string of   
   words; this has meaning on which the question may depend".  :)   
      
   Cheers,   
   Paul.   
      
   ... A closed mouth gathers no feet...   
   --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20130515   
    * Origin: Quinn's Rock - Live from Paul's Xubuntu desktop! (3:640/1384)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 15/2 16/0 120/544 123/130 131 203/0 221/0 1 6 360   
   SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/354 426 1014 240/1120 2100 5138 5832 5853 249/206   
   SEEN-BY: 249/317 261/38 280/5003 317/3 320/119 219 322/0 757 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 640/1321 1384 712/848 2454/119 3634/12   
   PATH: 640/1384 221/1 320/219 240/5832 229/426