Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ENGLISH_TUTOR    |    English Tutoring for Students of the Eng    |    4,347 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,652 of 4,347    |
|    Anton Shepelev to Alexander Koryagin    |
|    Women don't like rain    |
|    28 Jun 19 00:02:00    |
      MSGID: 2:221/6.0 5d152ec8       REPLY: 2:221/6.0 5d148e00       PID: JamNNTPd/Cygwin32 1.3 20190208       CHRS: IBMPC 2       TZUTC: 0300       TID: hpt/w32-mvc 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08       Alexander Koryagin to Anton Shepelev:              AK>>> When a person is in a company of friends he never       AK>>> speaks formally. And he should not to. It is too       AK>>> loathsome, IMHO.       AS>> Correction: "should not" or "ought not to" (depending       AS>> on what you mean).       AK> Is it true, Ardith? Can I replace "speak" for "to"?              My answer is no, you cannot replace "speak" with "to", nor       substitute "to" for "speak", because one is a verb and the       other a preposition. You can, however, replace one verb       with another, e.g.:               I love you better than I do myself.              AK> Languages follow people, not textbooks. Textbooks follow       AK> languages. ;-)              It is not so simple. In order to improve a program, you       must first acquire a thorough understanding of its structure       and working. The same with language. Good books -- among       which I rank Goold Brown's "Grammar of English Grammars",       Fowler's "King's English", and even Emerson's essay on       language -- enhance our command of language and thus give us       both the power and right to improve it. The destiny of       language shall not be left at the mercy of the illitirate       and the careless.              AK> As for the article I have already discussed here the       AK> similar case, when one prince returned home "smelling       AK> like horse". In other words, English is not very strict.       AK> ;)              Not at all, and Dallas Hinton explained it well that in this       phrase `horse' is uncountable becauase denotes a substance.       In Shakespeare, however, `snail' certainly refers to the       whole individual animal. Observe that Americans use `pie'       uncountably, too, e.g.: "We had tea and apple pie".              ---        * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/6.0)       SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 15/2 16/0 120/544 123/130 131 203/0 221/1 6 360       SEEN-BY: 226/17 227/114 229/354 426 1014 240/1120 2100 5138 5832 5853       SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 261/38 280/5003 317/3 320/119 219 322/0 757 342/200       SEEN-BY: 393/68 640/1384 2454/119       PATH: 221/6 1 320/219 240/5832 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca