Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ENGLISH_TUTOR    |    English Tutoring for Students of the Eng    |    4,347 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,261 of 4,347    |
|    alexander koryagin to Anton Shepelev    |
|    Gerunds    |
|    06 Feb 17 17:11:29    |
      Hi, Anton Shepelev!       I read your message from 04.02.2017 17:30       about Gerunds.                      AH>>> If you can use "the" &/or any other type of adjective to modify a        AH>>> word it's a noun... regardless of its origin.               AK>> We cannot say that a gerund is a form of a noun. Otherwise we        AK>> would study it when we study nouns.               AS> Wherefore the sharp dichotomy, when even conventional grammar        AS> acknowledges intermediate, or compound, parts of speech, somewhat        AS> similarly to the wave-particle dualism in quantum mechanics.              But we should remember that "dualism" means that a thing carries _both_(!)       qualities simultaneously. Light cannot be called photons OR waves. The same       situation with the gerund. It cannot be a pure noun. The gerund means action,       not description, although often it sounds similar. IMHO, the gerund is closer       to the verb, and that's why the gerund is studied usually after the verb.               |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca