F22_519d18bf@fidonet.org>   
   From: Ivan Shmakov    
      
   >>>>> "RW" == Roy Witt  writes:   
   >>>>> Ivan Shmakov wrote to Roy Witt:   
      
    IS> [1] http://www.amazon.com/Denon-AKDL1-Dedicated-Link-Cable/dp/B000I1X6PM   
      
    IS> [2] news:0001HW.CDB00E4C03038059B01029BF@news.eternal-september.org   
      
   [...]   
      
    IS> If only to introduce yet another single point of failure?  (Or,   
    IS> alternatively: censorship, surveillance, obscurity, etc.)   
      
    RW> None of the above, merely a courtesy to those who cannot copy a two   
    RW> line URL that didn't work in the first place, without doing some   
    RW> editing.   
      
   	My OP contained two URIs -- a 68 characters long http: one, and   
   	a 63 characters long news: one.  Neither should've been split,   
   	even after an "overhead" of 9 characters (reference labels and   
   	quote attribution) was added (thus resulting in 77 characters on   
   	a line at most.)   
      
   	Or is there a chance for a line to be split, or mangled, by the   
   	software even if less than 80 (79) characters long these days?   
      
   --    
   FSF associate member #7257   
   --- ifmail v.2.15dev5.4   
    * Origin: Aioe.org NNTP Server (2:5020/400)