TZUTC: -0600   
   MSGID: 3036.fido_elist@1:123/115 268f4146   
   REPLY: 1:261/38.0 866ad9db   
   PID: Synchronet 3.19c-Linux master/80de2727a Feb 28 2022 GCC 5.5.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Linux master/80de2727a Feb 28 2022 GCC 5.5.0   
   BBSID: PALANT   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   -=> Janis Kracht wrote to Dan Clough <=-   
      
    >> I swear to god it's like the vultures are f'n loose in fidonet...   
    >> Geez.   
      
    > Ummmmmmmmm, could it be because you up and left in a hissy fit, with no   
    > warning and no explanation?   
      
    JK> Sorry, you are wrong there - it was NOT a 'hissy fit' "with no   
    JK> warning and no explanation".   I contacted as many people as I   
    JK> could to let them know I _had_ to leave because of finances.   
    JK> Then, as it turned out I _didn't_ need to leave so I'm back -   
    JK> aren't you happy...   
      
   The was basically no warning, and you know it.  Finances?  How much does    
   it cost to maintain a Fido presence...?  Very close to zero, in my    
   estimation.   
      
    JK> Ron's job is fine, our $$ is fine and I'm happy to not be   
    JK> involved in as many things as I was (like you care Lol).   
      
   Well that's good.   
      
    JK> Sean was gracious enough to take over the FidoGazette, so   
    JK> everything is cool as far as I'm concerned.   
      
   "s/over/back"   
      
    > And now you're back, with no explanation as to  what went on?   
    > Could *THAT* be the reason that others "took over" stuff you were doing,   
    > but abandoned?  Ya think?   
      
    JK> I never abandoned the RAR echo, I was the current elisted   
    JK> moderator until Vince decided _he_ wanted to take it over.  As   
    JK> you should know, there is no requirement to be "in" Fidonet to be   
    JK> a moderator.   
      
   It was publicly announced (either by you or those you notified), that    
   you were leaving Fidonet *permanently*.  Why *wouldn't* you be replaced    
   as a moderator, and any other Fido function, in that case?  It's just    
   common sense.   
      
    JK> Authors are still sending me files they would like distributed,   
    JK> so when they do so, I will continue to get them in the various   
    JK> file echos like the PDN and Util*net areas.   
      
   Uh-huh.  OK.   
      
      
      
   ... Pros are those who do their jobs well, even when they don't feel like it.   
   === MultiMail/Linux v0.52   
   --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux   
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 15/0 18/0 200 90/1 105/81 106/201 116/116 120/340   
   SEEN-BY: 123/0 25 115 131 180 200 755 129/305 330 331 134/101 135/300   
   SEEN-BY: 138/146 153/757 7715 218/700 222/2 226/30 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/206 317 400 424 426 428 664 700 240/1120 5832 250/1 261/1466   
   SEEN-BY: 266/512 275/100 1000 282/1038 292/854 299/6 300/4 301/1 317/3   
   SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 342/11 200 396/45 460/58 633/280 640/1321   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 3634/0 12 15 24 27 50 119 5020/1042   
   PATH: 123/115 3634/12 153/7715 229/426