Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    EDGE_ONLINE    |    End Times - Mystery Babylon and the Beas    |    461 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 77 of 461    |
|    Jeff Snyder to All    |
|    Another American Bribe    |
|    16 Nov 10 23:16:00    |
      This is just another shameless American bribe. It is the Israeli government       milking the US Government -- and the US economy -- for all that it is worth,       as it has been doing for decades now.              The sad thing is, the USA and Israel have been doing this for so long now,       that few people see anything wrong with this arrangement. They view it as       "business-as-usual".              But this is not the way that it should be. If Israel is truly sincere in its       desires to create peace with its Palestinian neighbors, and if it is truly       sincere in its support of a Palestinian state, then absolutely no bribes       should be necessary. The Jews should deal honestly, in good faith, with the       Palestinians, and vice versa. There should be absolutely no need for bribes,       and pressure from outside parties.              Three billion dollars is a lot of money. Just think of how much good could       be done with that money, if it was invested instead in improving the welfare       of American citizens.              It is shameful to see how Netanyahu now has the American Government begging       at his feet. Obama and Clinton are tools, just like so many American leaders       before them.              It is also alarming that this latest American bribe exempts East Jerusalem.       This fact alone makes the negotiations meaningless, and the Palestinians       will never accept it.              Why is the USA willing to exempt East Jerusalem? The USA is offering Israel       so much. Why is it asking for so little in return?              Furthermore, the fact that the USA is willing to head off and neutralize any       attempts by the UN to influence the peace talks is alarming. If, as this       article states, the purpose of this stipulation is to prevent the       Palestinians from gaining UN support for a unilateral declaration of       Palestinian statement, then what does this say about Israeli intentions?              In my mind, it is saying only one thing: The Jews are entering this       agreement in bad faith, and already have intentions of betrayal, precisely       as they have done so many times before. In other words, during these ninety       days -- assuming that the Israeli cabinet agrees to it -- the Jews will get       much of what they want; but when all is said and done, once the ninety days       have passed, everything will return to "business-as-usual", and the       Palestinians will have very little to show for it, if anything, and the Jews       will continue to build, build, build, and expand, expand, expand into       Palestinian territory.              I will be very surprised if I am wrong.              The bottom line is that Netanyahu has Obama at a political disadvantage.       Obama has been severely weakened by recent elections, and he has done poorly       in his overseas dealings. He needs some kind of a political victory.       Netanyahu may be willing to give it to him -- which I doubt -- but if it       comes, it will be at a very high price, as we are already seeing.                     Netanyahu Agrees to Push for Freeze in Settlements              By MARK LANDLER - NYT              November 13, 2010                     WASHINGTON -- Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has agreed to push       his cabinet to freeze most construction on settlements in the West Bank for       90 days to break an impasse in peace negotiations with the Palestinians, an       official briefed on talks between the United States and Israel said Saturday       evening.              In return, the Obama administration has offered Israel a package of security       incentives and fighter jets worth $3 billion that would be contingent on the       signing of a peace agreement, the official said. The United States would       also block any moves in the United Nations Security Council that would try       to shape a final peace agreement.              The quid pro quo was hashed out by Mr. Netanyahu and Secretary of State       Hillary Rodham Clinton in seven and a half hours of talks in New York on       Thursday.              The partial freeze would not include East Jerusalem, which the Palestinians       view as the future capital of a Palestinian state and where recent Israeli       building set off a firestorm of criticism.              It was unclear whether the prime minister could win approval for the United       States deal from his cabinet, which has been reluctant to freeze settlement       construction. It was also unclear if the leaks of the details of the       agreement, which were widely reported in Israeli newspapers on Saturday,       were designed to put pressure on Mr. Netanyahu.              He convened an unusual meeting of the inner council of his cabinet in       Jerusalem on Saturday night, and he will meet with the full cabinet on       Sunday, according to an Israeli official.              If approved, the agreement could surmount a stubborn hurdle to talks between       Israel and the Palestinians, which began with much fanfare in Washington in       early September but soon ran aground after Israel's 10-month partial       moratorium on settlement construction expired later that month.              It would also give President Obama a foreign policy victory after the       Democrats' midterm election losses and a tough few days for him in Asia, in       which he failed to win support on trade and international economic issues.              The stalled Middle East peace process had loomed as another setback. The       Palestinians have refused to return to the bargaining table unless Israel       extends the moratorium. And Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton have failed to sway       Mr. Netanyahu, despite repeated public and private entreaties.              Last week, Mr. Obama and Mr. Netanyahu again traded barbed words after the       Israeli authorities announced plans to build new Jewish housing in a       contested part of East Jerusalem, while the prime minister was visiting the       United States and Mr. Obama was traveling in Indonesia.              This proposed 90-day freeze would be nonrenewable: the United States would       not ask for further extensions, the official with knowledge of the       deliberations said.              The freeze would apply not only to new construction, but to building that       began after the 10-month moratorium expired in September, the official said.       That is a particularly delicate stipulation, given the large number of       houses that have begun being built since then. The ban would apply to       residential building; public structures like schools and community centers       would be unaffected.              The logic behind a 90-day extension is that the two sides would aim for a       swift agreement on the borders of a Palestinian state. That would make the       long dispute over settlements irrelevant since it would be clear which       housing blocks fell into Israel and which fell into a Palestinian state.              The security incentives offered by the administration, though generous, do       not appear to go far beyond the support the United States typically offers       Israel. For example, the United States has not agreed to endorse a long-term       Israeli security presence in the Jordan River Valley, the official said.              The American pledge to block initiatives in the Security Council appears       aimed at heading off efforts by the Palestinian Authority to seek       international support for a unilateral declaration of statehood -- something       it has considered in recent weeks as Israel has refused to reconsider a new       building moratorium.              A spokesman for the Israeli Embassy in Washington, Jonathan Peled, declined       to comment on the reports, as did Philip J. Crowley, the spokesman for the       United States Department of State.                            Jeff Snyder, SysOp - Armageddon BBS Visit us at endtimeprophecy.org port 23       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------       Your Download Center 4 Mac BBS Software & Christian Files. We Use Hermes II                     --- Hermes Web Tosser 1.1        * Origin: Armageddon BBS -- Guam, Mariana Islands (1:345/3777.0)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca