Hello Robert!   
      
   22 Jan 16 12:10, you wrote to all:   
      
    RW> This netmail should have been routed through 618:100/1 instead of   
    RW> 1:116/116 -- my Fidonet NC.  Here is my EZYPACK.CTL file:   
      
     I'm not the best at netmail, but let me try.   
      
    RW> 1:116/116   
    RW> 1:261/38   
    RW> 1:123/10   
    RW> 618:100/1   
    RW> 1:* VIA 1:116/116   
    RW> 2:* VIA 1:116/116   
    RW> 3:* VIA 1:116/116   
    RW> 4:* VIA 1:116/116   
    RW> 5:* VIA 1:116/116   
    RW> 6:* VIA 1:116/116   
    RW> 618:* VIA 618:100/1   
      
    RW> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.   
      
     Here is mine:  This is how I did Micronet back when I was a HUB for that   
   network.  It's currently commented out, but you can figure it out. :)   
      
      
    Nick Andre (for all other mail) 1:* 2:* 3:* 4:* 5:* 6:* VIA 1:229/426 ; ;   
   Micronet Hubbing/Routing ; My Nodes ;618:400/10 VIA 618:400/10 ;618:400/12 VIA   
   618:400/12 ; Sean Dennis ;618:* VIA 618:618/1 ;   
      
   Shawn   
      
   ... An argument is where two people are trying to get the LAST word in FIRST!   
   ---   
    * Origin: The Point of it all (1:229/452.1)