On 04 Dec 96 15:11, Richard Webb wrote to Andrew Leary:   
      
    RW>> As I read the rules of the echo under discussion, I note   
    RW>> that it's implied that access is restricted to certain   
    RW>> individuals but nowhere is it stated explicitly that the   
    RW>> echo may not be made publicly available on a read-only   
    RW>> basis.   
      
    AL>> The moderator should update the echo rules to state the restrictions   
    AL>> explicitly. If this is not done, then it will be very difficult to   
    AL>> cut the leak's feed, once it is determined where the leak is.   
      
    RW> My thoughts on this as well.   
      
   Being as how the echo in question is moderated by a member of the NAB,   
   cutting a feed on that system shouldn't be a problem. If the mod doesn't   
   get any cooperation from a downlink, they can just cut that node off.   
      
      
               R\%/itt   
      
      
      NASCAR - Everything else is JUST a game? AHRA? IHRA? NHRA? INDY? F1?   
      
      
   --- Hate Mongers and Morons, get your coffee and keyboards ready!   
    * Origin: Texas Lone-Star - Texan, American, USAian  (1:387/22)