Hello Richard!   
      
   Saturday November 24 2012 19:53, Richard Webb wrote to all:   
      
    RW> Lately we've seen discussion elsewhere about folks having   
    RW> access to an echo who are restricted from access by the   
    RW> moderator.  YEs we know, echomail is by and large a public   
    RW> thing.   
      
    RW> I find it almost difficult at times to promulgate reasonable rules for   
    RW> an echo without being too verbose, or leaving important items out.   
    RW> Such as the usual restrictions on gating, etc.   
      
    RW> As I read the rules of the echo under discussion, I note   
    RW> that it's implied that access is restricted to certain   
    RW> individuals but nowhere is it stated explicitly that the   
    RW> echo may not be made publicly available on a read-only   
    RW> basis.   
      
    RW> Thoughts anyone?   
      
   The moderator should update the echo rules to state the restrictions   
   explicitly.  If this is not done, then it will be very difficult to cut the   
   leak's feed, once it is determined where the leak is.   
      
   Andrew   
      
   ---   
    * Origin: Bits & Bytes BBS * V.Everything! * 860/535-4284 (1:320/119)