Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ECHOMODS    |    Something to do with echo moderators    |    130 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 25 of 130    |
|    Andrew Leary to Richard Webb    |
|    administrivia    |
|    11 Jan 12 21:37:12    |
      Hello Richard!              Wednesday January 11 2012 19:55, Richard Webb wrote to all:               RW> Please note that rules for this echo are changing slightly.        RW> Please request permission to post if you are an echo        RW> moderator who is not a Fidonet sysop.               RW> This is in response to a suggestion made by Roy Witt, which        RW> I believe can benefit moderators and sysops both.        RW> Points and users must request permission via routed netmail        RW> preferred, or via their host sysop in the echo. USers and        RW> points may however read this echomail conference.               RW> I am open to further suggestions on refinement of these        RW> rules to facilitate discussions between echo moderators,        RW> echo carriers, and providers of other FIdonet services        RW> related to the management of echomail.              Just a clarification:              What standard are we using to determine who is or isn't an echo moderator?              Regards,              Andrew       Moderator, RA_UTIL              ---        * Origin: Bits & Bytes BBS * V.Everything! * 860/535-4284 (1:320/119)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca