TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221   
   MSGID: 2:280/464 61db284b   
   REPLY: 1:3634/12.73 61db1a6e   
   Hi mark,   
      
   On 2022-01-09 12:21:24, you wrote to me:   
      
    WV>> Maybe that was a good idea in 1987, when Fidonet was totally   
    WV>> different. But it is not current practice for the ELIST.   
      
    ml> i said it was one reason for listing non-distributed echotags... i didn't   
    ml> say anything about it being current practise... other reasons are for   
    ml> ownership and archives...   
      
   Ownership of a dead area? What's the point?   
      
   The (current) ELIST is not for archiving. It's for listing active areas IMHO...   
      
    ml> there are others, as well...   
      
   Well please mention them. I don't see it...   
      
    ml> whether you agree with them or not is another matter...   
      
   )   
      
   Bye, Wilfred.   
      
   --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 114/705 120/340   
   SEEN-BY: 123/120 131 124/5016 129/305 153/250 757 7715 154/10 203/0   
   SEEN-BY: 218/840 220/70 221/0 226/17 30 227/114 229/110 200 424 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/5832 249/206 317 400 250/5 8 266/512 267/800   
   SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 282/1038 292/854 8125 298/25 301/1 305/3 310/31   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/120 633/280   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 100 330 340 772/220 230 2452/250   
   PATH: 280/464 770/1 317/3 229/426