home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   ECHOLIST      [ADM] EchoList Access Conference      11,388 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 11,086 of 11,388   
   address@not.available to All   
   Re: Alternative solution - was [Re: Manu   
   19 Jan 19 01:52:00   
   
   Path:   
   eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!b   
   order1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.ne   
   ws.xs4all.nl!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!n   
   ewsgate.news.xs4all.nl!nzpost1.xs4all.net!not-for-mail   
   From: "R.Wieser"    
   Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support   
   References:   
   <587f8750$0$21525$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>   
      
   <587fbc47$0$21546$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>   
   Subject: Re: Alternative solution - was [Re: Manually setting a STATIC IP   
   inWinXPPro]   
   Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:52:00 +0100   
   X-Priority: 3   
   X-MSMail-Priority: Normal   
   X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200   
   X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200   
   Lines: 162   
   Message-ID: <58806f0a$0$21448$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>   
   NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.163.119.5   
   X-Trace: 1484812042 news.xs4all.nl 21448 83.163.119.5:1416   
   X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl   
   Xref: news.eternal-september.org   
   microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support:31894   
      
   Addendum,   
      
   I just re-read my post and see I didn't make my self too clear (excuse of   
   the day: It was late when I wrote it), I should have quoted an additional   
   line:   
      
   > *NO*   
   > A "cross over" cable connects two Ethernet ports.   
   ....   
   > A "null-modem" connects two DTE or two DCE together.   
      
   Those cables have the _exact same_ function, one for serial, the other for   
   ethernet.   
      
   And if I may point something else out, the phrase "connects two Ethernet   
   ports" is non-informative.  Like if you would have used "two serial ports"   
   in the second.   
      
   Also consider that for ethernet all 'puters are comparable to DTEs from the   
   serial-port case, with the modems, hubs and switches taking the place of   
   DCEs.  Maybe that makes it easier to see how both cables are effectivily the   
   same.   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
      
   -- Origional message:   
   R.Wieser  schreef in berichtnieuws   
   587fbc47$0$21546$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...   
   > Richard,   
   >   
   > > *NO*   
   > ...   
   > > A "null-modem" connects two DTE or two DCE together.   
   >   
   > As you feel that strong about it I googled to have some backup for what I   
   > assumed to be true, and came across this page:   
   >   
   > http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/1EE0DD8AF67922FA86256F720071DECF   
   >   
   > It shows that the so-called "null-modem" cable is to connect a two devices   
   > of the _same type_ together (in other words: crossing the TXD and RXD   
   > wires),  and the "straight thru" to connect a DCE to a DTE.   
   >   
   > To be honest, I have allways though of a "null modem" cable as being the   
   one   
   > with just TXD and RXD (and ground ofcourse) connected to the other machine   
   > (regardless of if it was of the same, or opposite type), with the control   
   > lines connected back to their counterparts on the same connector.   
   >   
   > So, it looks like we both made a mistake. :-)   
   >   
   > > P.S. I've been using null modems for >50 years ;}   
   >   
   > I have been using them, and others of its kind for quite a while too, and   
   > have even been known to solder a few myself.   Regardless our time that we   
   > used them, we both seem to have misremembered.   
   >   
   > Also, age has little meaning on the "interwebz".   Knowledge is the only   
   > thing that counts here.  :-)   
   >   
   > Regards,   
   > Rudy Wieser   
   >   
   > P.s.   
   > More of the same:   
   >   
   https://www.decisivetactics.com/support/view?article=crossover-or-null-modem   
   > -vs-straight-through-serial-cable   
   >   
   > http://www.zytrax.com/tech/layer_1/cables/tech_rs232.htm   
   >   
   > http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/cable.html   
   >   
   > All show a "null modem" cable to connect two devices of the same type.   
   >   
   > I'm not sure how you ...   
   > Scratch that.  I notice all your links are to the same source.   
   >   
   >   
   > -- Origional message:   
   > Richard Owlett  schreef in berichtnieuws   
   > GNqdncrpM4GpA-LFnZ2dnUU7-WXNnZ2d@supernews.com...   
   > > On 1/18/2017 9:23 AM, R.Wieser wrote:   
   > > > Richard,   
   > > >   
   > > >> The minimal network was being pursued as it was a close as   
   > > >> I *HAD THOUGHT* I could come to a "null modem cable".   
   > > >   
   > > > Thats the "cross over" cable I mentioned* :-)   
   > > >   
   > > > *although a null-modem cable normally includes cross-over, it does   
   need   
   > to.   
   > >   
   > > *NO*   
   > > A "cross over" cable connects two Ethernet ports.   
   > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medium-dependent_interface#Auto_MDI-X   
   > >   
   > > A "null-modem" connects two DTE or two DCE together.   
   > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_circuit-terminating_equipment   
   > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_terminal_equipment   
   > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_modem   
   > >   
   > > IOW connect COM ports of two computers to each other.   
   > >   
   > > P.S. I've been using null modems for >50 years ;}   
   > > Ethernet is only ~30 years old.   
   > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > >   
   > > > But its still a good idea to first connect to a known-to-be-good   
   device   
   > (the   
   > > > modem or smart switch (or anything else with a web-accessible setup) I   
   > > > mentioned) so that you can see your fixed IP actually works (on both   
   > > > 'puters), _before_ you try that cross-over cable (I'm not sure you   
   > realize,   
   > > > but now you've introduced a _third_ location that could give you   
   > troubles   
   > > > with setting up such a 'puter-to-'puter connection).   
   > > >   
   > > > Regards,   
   > > > Rudy Wieser   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > -- Origional question.   
   > > > Richard Owlett  schreef in berichtnieuws   
   > > > LZydneiMicXqHOLFnZ2dnUU7-XnNnZ2d@supernews.com...   
   > > >> On 1/16/2017 7:47 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:   
   > > >>> I have two Lenovo laptops. One running WinXP Pro. The other runs   
   > > >>> Linux.   
   > > >>> I wish to create a minimal network. It will consist of only those   
   > > >>> two machines.   
   > > >>> Neither will have any internet connectivity.   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>> I've found a number of web references to setting static IP   
   > > >>> addresses on Windows machines.   
   > > >>> *HOWEVER* assume internet connectivity by one/both machines.   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>> Can anyone point me to any documentation EXPLICITLY covering my   
   > > >>> {admittedly} peculiar requirement.   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>> TIA   
   > > >>   
   > > >> The minimal network was being pursued as it was a close as I *HAD   
   > > >> THOUGHT* I could come to a "null modem cable".   
   > > >> A USB implementation is available -   
   > > >> http://www.mouser.com/ds/2/163/DS_USBNMC-5030.pdf .   
   > > >> I'll check local suppliers.   
   > > >> Will also continue pursuing the LAN solution for its educational   
   > > >> value.   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1   
    * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx  //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca